EconBase
← All papers

Econometrics For Decision Making: Building Foundations Sketched By Haavelmo And Wald

Charles F. Manski

arXiv 17 Dec 2019 · Econometrics · publishedEconometrica (2021) · 17 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:1912.08726 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex

Abstract

Haavelmo (1944) proposed a probabilistic structure for econometric modeling, aiming to make econometrics useful for decision making. His fundamental contribution has become thoroughly embedded in subsequent econometric research, yet it could not answer all the deep issues that the author raised. Notably, Haavelmo struggled to formalize the implications for decision making of the fact that models can at most approximate actuality. In the same period, Wald (1939, 1945) initiated his own seminal development of statistical decision theory. Haavelmo favorably cited Wald, but econometrics did not embrace statistical decision theory. Instead, it focused on study of identification, estimation, and statistical inference. This paper proposes statistical decision theory as a framework for evaluation of the performance of models in decision making. I particularly consider the common practice of as-if optimization: specification of a model, point estimation of its parameters, and use of the point estimate to make a decision that would be optimal if the estimate were accurate. A central theme is that one should evaluate as-if optimization or any other model-based decision rule by its performance across the state space, listing all states of nature that one believes feasible, not across the model space. I apply the theme to prediction and treatment choice. Statistical decision theory is conceptually simple, but application is often challenging. Advancement of computation is the primary task to continue building the foundations sketched by Haavelmo and Wald.

Citation extraction

No citation data for this paper: 1912.08726_source: not a tar archive and not gzip (Not a gzipped file (b'%P')). arXiv holds no LaTeX source for roughly 8% of econ.EM submissions (PDF-only), and those can never enter the citation graph.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Individual Shrinkage for Random Effects1.00063
2Dynamically Consistent Statistical Decisions1.00063
3Treatment Choice with Nonlinear Regret0.92843
4Optimal Decision Rules when Payoffs are Partially Identified0.87452
5Policy Learning with Confidence$^$0.87452
6Structural models for policy-making0.84333
7Policy Learning with Observational Data : The Case of Hepatitis C Treatment for HIV/HCV Co-Infected Patients0.81142
8Certified Decisions0.73732
9Compound Selection Decisions: An Almost SURE Approach0.64422
10Extending Economic Models with Testable Assumptions: Theory and Applications0.58531