EconBase
← All papers

Generalized Lee Bounds

Vira Semenova

arXiv 28 Aug 2020 · Econometrics

arXiv:2008.12720 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Lee (2009) is a common approach to bound the average causal effect in the presence of selection bias, assuming the treatment effect on selection has the same sign for all subjects. This paper generalizes Lee bounds to allow the sign of this effect to be identified by pretreatment covariates, relaxing the standard (unconditional) monotonicity to its conditional analog. Asymptotic theory for generalized Lee bounds is proposed in low-dimensional smooth and high-dimensional sparse designs. The paper also generalizes Lee bounds to accommodate multiple outcomes. Focusing on JobCorps job training program, I first show that unconditional monotonicity is unlikely to hold, and then demonstrate the use of covariates to tighten the bounds.

Citation extraction

89
references
158
in-text mentions
89
distinct cited
3
self-citations
12,611
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 50% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Belloni, A. and Chernozhukov, V (2011) $_1$-penalized quantile regression in high-dimensional sparse models1.00053100%
2Newey, W (1994) The asymptotic variance of semiparametric estimators0.92843100%
3Lee, D (2009) Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects0.90319474%
4Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Fernandez-Val, I., and Hansen, C (2017) Program evaluation and causal inference with high-dimensional data0.87452100%
5Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C… (2018) Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters0.8434375%
6Olma, T (2021) Nonparametric estimation of truncated conditional expectation functions0.84333100%
7Beresteanu, A. and Molinari, F (2008) Asymptotic properties for a class of partially identified models0.7375260%
8Bontemps, C., Magnac, T., and Maurin, E (2012) Set identified linear models0.7375260%
9Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J., and McConnell, S (2008) Does job corps work? impact findings from the national job corps study0.7373367%
10Robins, J. and Rotnitzky, A (1995) Semiparametric efficiency in multivariate regression models with missing data0.73732100%

Showing the top 10 of 89 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization0.961185
2Treatment Evaluation at the Intensive and Extensive Margins0.934278
3Debiased Machine Learning of Aggregated Intersection Bounds and Other Causal Parameters0.92843
4Lee Bounds with a Continuous Treatment in Sample Selection0.87452
5Difference-in-Differences with Sample Selection0.843103
6Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects0.81142
7A Sensitivity Analysis of the Surrogate Index Approach for Estimating Long-Term Treatment Effects0.73732
8Debiased Machine Learning of Set-Identified Linear Models0.64422
9When Should We (Not) Interpret Linear IV Estimands as LATE?0.64422
10Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding0.64422