arXiv 6 Jul 2026 · Econometrics
arXiv:2607.04885 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
This paper studies the performance of data-driven decisions from a geometric perspective. A policymaker learns from an innovated donor population to decide whether to innovate groups in a distinct target population, and must compensate for any mistake. I introduce certification: an estimator yields certified decisions when it controls the probability of a mistake, whenever intervention effects are sufficiently large in magnitude. First, I show that certification implies a bound on worst-case compensation. Then, I study matching estimators with positive weights and show that, in a large-sample regime, affordability by certification becomes a purely geometric problem. I prove that a Delaunay interpolant, whose properties are well-known from results in computational geometry, delivers the best affordability guarantee. Finally, I show how this result can be leveraged to guide donor-data collection plans to bring worst-case compensation cost below a target level. I illustrate the gains of adopting this geometric point of view in targeting and collection plans with a semi-synthetic empirical application in development economics.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 69% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muralidharan, Karthik and Niehaus, Paul and Sukhtankar, Sandip (2016) Building State Capacity: Evidence from Biometric Smartcards in India | 0.928 | 4 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 | Kitagawa, Toru and Tetenov, Aleksey Who Should Be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 | Manski, Charles F Statistical Treatment Rules for Heterogeneous Populations | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Mbakop, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max Model Selection for Treatment Choice: Penalized Welfare Maximization | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Delaunay, Boris (1934) Sur la sphère vide | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan Policy Learning With Observational Data | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Shayne Waldron (1998) The Error in Linear Interpolation at the Vertices of a Simplex | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Kohei Yata Optimal Decision Rules Under Partial Identification | 0.585 | 3 | 1 | 100% |
| 9 | Alberto Abadie and Jérémy L’Hour (2021) A Penalized Synthetic Control Estimator for Disaggregated Data | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | Montiel Olea, José Luis and Qiu, Chen and Stoye, Jörg (2026) Decision Theory for Treatment Choice Problems with Partial Identification | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 23 scored citations.