Daniel Czarnowske, Amrei Stammann
arXiv 21 Dec 2025 · Econometrics
arXiv:2512.18678 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
Inference for fixed effects estimators of linear and nonlinear panel models is often unreliable due to Nickell- and/or incidental parameter biases. This article develops new inferential theory for (non)linear fixed effects M-estimators with data featuring a three-dimensional panel structure, such as sender x receiver x time. Our theory accommodates bipartite, directed, and undirected network panel data, integrates distinct specifications for additively separable unobserved effects with different layers of variation, and allows for weakly exogenous regressors. Our analysis reveals that the asymptotic properties of fixed effects estimators with three-dimensional panel data can deviate substantially from those with two-dimensional panel data. While for some specifications the estimator turns out to be asymptotically unbiased, in other specifications, it suffers from a particularly severe inference problem, characterized by a degenerate asymptotic distribution and complex bias structures. We address this atypical inference problem, by deriving explicit expressions to debias the fixed effects estimators.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 22% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weidner, Martin and Zylkin, Thomas (2021) Bias and Consistency in Three-Way Gravity Models | 1.000 | 5 | 4 | 100% |
| 2 | Iván Fernández-Val and Martin Weidner (2016) Individual and Time Effects in Nonlinear Panel Models with Large N, T | 0.952 | 22 | 6 | 86% |
| 3 | Iván Fernández-Val and Martin Weidner (2018) Fixed Effects Estimation of Large-T Panel Data Models | 0.928 | 4 | 3 | 100% |
| 4 | Graham, Bryan S (2016) Homophily and transitivity in dynamic network formation | 0.874 | 6 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Ayden Higgins (2026) Jackknife Inference for Fixed Effects Models | 0.754 | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 6 | Iván Fernández-Val (2009) Fixed Effects Estimation of Structural Parameters and Marginal Effects in Panel Probit Models | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | David W. Hughes (2026) A jackknife bias correction for nonlinear network data models with fixed effects | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Julian Hinz and Amrei Stammann and Joschka Wanner (2020) State Dependence and Unobserved Heterogeneity in the Extensive Margin of Trade self | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Yan, Ting and Jiang, Binyan and Fienberg, Stephen E. and Leng, Chenlei (2018) Statistical inference in a directed network model with covariates | 0.585 | 3 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | Gary Chamberlain (1980) Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 67 scored citations.
arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.
| Citing paper | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackknife Inference for Fixed Effects Models | 0.737 | 3 | 2 |
| 2 | Inference for Fixed Effects Estimators when Panels are Unbalanced | 0.511 | 5 | 2 |