EconBase
← All papers

Non-Robustness of the Cluster-Robust Inference: with a Proposal of a New Robust Method

Yuya Sasaki, Yulong Wang

arXiv 31 Oct 2022 · Econometrics · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:2210.16991 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

The conventional cluster-robust (CR) standard errors may not be robust. They are vulnerable to data that contain a small number of large clusters. When a researcher uses the 51 states in the U.S. as clusters, the largest cluster (California) consists of about 10% of the total sample. Such a case in fact violates the assumptions under which the widely used CR methods are guaranteed to work. We formally show that the conventional CR methods fail if the distribution of cluster sizes follows a power law with exponent less than two. Besides the example of 51 state clusters, some examples are drawn from a list of recent original research articles published in a top journal. In light of these negative results about the existing CR methods, we propose a weighted CR (WCR) method as a simple fix. Simulation studies support our arguments that the WCR method is robust while the conventional CR methods are not.

Citation extraction

37
references
70
in-text mentions
37
distinct cited
1
self-citations
8,256
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 71% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Bugni, F., I. Canay, A. Shaikh, and M. Tabord-Meehan (2022) Inference for cluster randomized experiments with non-ignorable cluster sizes1.00073100%
2Djogbenou, A. A., J. G. MacKinnon, and M. . Nielsen (2019) Asymptotic theory and wild bootstrap inference with clustered errors0.7946450%
3MacKinnon, J. G., M. . Nielsen, and M. D. Webb (2022) b): Fast and reliable jackknife and bootstrap methods for cluster-robust inference0.7373367%
4Alfonsi, L., O. Bandiera, V. Bassi, R. Burgess, I. Rasul, M. Sulaima… (2020) Tackling youth unemployment: Evidence from a labor market experiment in Uganda0.64441100%
5Burstein, A., G. Hanson, L. Tian, and J. Vogel (2020) Tradability and the labor-market impact of immigration: theory and evidence from the United States0.64441100%
6Enikolopov, R., A. Makarin, and M. Petrova (2020) Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia0.64441100%
7Arellano, M (1987) Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators0.64422100%
8Hansen, B. E (2022) a): Jackknife standard errors for clustered regression0.64422100%
9Hansen, B. E. and S. Lee (2019) Asymptotic theory for clustered samples0.64422100%
10Hersch, J (1998) Compensating differentials for gender-specific job injury risks0.64422100%

Showing the top 10 of 37 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Inference for Cluster Randomized Experiments with Non-ignorable Cluster Sizes0.40511
2Inference in Cluster Randomized Trials with Matched Pairs0.40511
3Estimation and exclusion restrictions in clustered linear models0.40511