EconBase
← All papers

Does p-Hacking Mitigate or Exacerbate the Effects of Publication Bias?

Yong Cai, Agathe Pernoud, Boli Xu

arXiv 4 Sep 2026 · Econometrics

arXiv:2609.05372 · PDF · Extracted main text

Abstract

This paper studies the effects of p-hacking on the bias of published estimates when papers with statistically significant results are selectively published. We show that fast p-hacking---actions that lead to large changes in p-values---always exacerbates the bias from selective publication. On the other hand, slow p-hacking---actions that lead to small changes in p-values---exacerbates bias when selection is weak, but mitigates it when selection is strong. In a model featuring both types of p-hacking, we show that a normality assumption identifies the true distribution of effects as well as the counterfactual mean that would obtain under selective publication without p-hacking. Applying the model to meta-analyses on the effects of behavioral nudges and development aid, we find suggestive evidence that both mitigation and exacerbation can arise in practice.

Citation extraction

64
references
127
in-text mentions
64
distinct cited
0
self-citations
10,555
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 32% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Andrews, Isaiah and Kasy, Maximilian (2019) Identification of and correction for publication bias1.00063100%
2Brodeur, Abel and Lé, Mathias and Sangnier, Marc and Zylberberg, Yanos (2016) Star wars: The empirics strike back0.87462100%
3Simonsohn, Uri (2020) p-hacking fast and slow: Evaluating a forthcoming AER paper deeming some econ literatures less trustworthy0.8434475%
4Masicampo, EJ and Lalande, Daniel R (2012) A peculiar prevalence of p values just below. 050.84333100%
5Doucouliagos, Hristos and Paldam, Martin (2011) The ineffectiveness of development aid on growth: An update0.81711355%
6Mertens, Stephanie and Herberz, Mario and Hahnel, Ulf JJ and Brosch,… (2022) The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains0.81711355%
7Friese, Malte and Frankenbach, Julius (2020) p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.0.81142100%
8Hedges, Larry V (1984) Estimation of effect size under nonrandom sampling: The effects of censoring studies yielding statistically insignificant mean d…0.73732100%
9Iyengar, Satish and Greenhouse, Joel B (1988) Selection models and the file drawer problem0.73732100%
10Jagadeesan, Ravi and Viviano, Davide (2024) Publication Design with Incentives in Mind0.73732100%

Showing the top 10 of 64 scored citations.