EconBase
← All papers

Calibrated Horizon-Weighted Local Projection Designs for Markov Switchbacks

Makoto Nakakita, Teruo Nakatsuma

arXiv 13 Jul 2026 · Statistics — Methodology

arXiv:2607.11694 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

We study temporal assignment design for Markov switchback experiments when the reported object is a dynamic local-projection target. We develop a calibrated selector that chooses the feasible persistence minimizing the covariance, HAC, residual-bootstrap, or realized-schedule risk of the estimator and reporting object specified before the experiment. A balanced homoskedastic Markov benchmark yields a closed form because the lagged-assignment information matrix is AR(1)-Toeplitz with a tridiagonal inverse. The benchmark maps local-projection reporting weights into persistence recommendations within a prespecified first-order Markov class. Field recommendations replace the benchmark covariance with residualized, serially dependent, pilot-calibrated, or randomization-based risk. A semi-synthetic Low Carbon London evaluation uses observed half-hourly baseline dynamics and known injected responses to assess design risk. It evaluates the covariance calculations under realistic load autocovariance and identifies when calibrated covariance selection should replace the homoskedastic Markov formula. Near-boundary designs use randomization-first inference when many-spell normal approximations are unsupported.

Citation extraction

85
references
108
in-text mentions
85
distinct cited
0
self-citations
14,712
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 54% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Strbac, G. and Tindemans, S. H. and Woolf, M. and Bilton, M. and Car… (2024) Low Carbon London Project: Data from the Dynamic Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing Trial, 2013 [data collection]0.7373367%
2Aronow, P. M. and Samii, C (2017) Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment0.64422100%
3Athey, S. and Eckles, D. and Imbens, G. W (2018) Exact p-values for network interference0.64422100%
4Atkinson, A. C. and Donev, A. N. and Tobias, R. D (2007) Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS0.64422100%
5Barnichon, R. and Brownlees, C (2019) Impulse response estimation by smooth local projections0.64422100%
6Bojinov, I. and Rambachan, A. and Shephard, N (2021) Panel experiments and dynamic causal effects: A finite population perspective0.64422100%
7Bojinov, I. and Shephard, N (2019) Time series experiments and causal estimands: Exact randomization tests and trading0.64422100%
8Bojinov, I. and Simchi-Levi, D. and Zhao, J (2023) Design and analysis of switchback experiments0.64422100%
9Carlson, J. and Shephard, N (2026) When are time series predictions causal? The potential system and dynamic causal effects0.64422100%
10Chaloner, K. and Verdinelli, I (1995) Bayesian experimental design: A review0.64422100%

Showing the top 10 of 85 scored citations.