Makoto Nakakita, Teruo Nakatsuma
arXiv 13 Jul 2026 · Statistics — Methodology
arXiv:2607.11694 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
We study temporal assignment design for Markov switchback experiments when the reported object is a dynamic local-projection target. We develop a calibrated selector that chooses the feasible persistence minimizing the covariance, HAC, residual-bootstrap, or realized-schedule risk of the estimator and reporting object specified before the experiment. A balanced homoskedastic Markov benchmark yields a closed form because the lagged-assignment information matrix is AR(1)-Toeplitz with a tridiagonal inverse. The benchmark maps local-projection reporting weights into persistence recommendations within a prespecified first-order Markov class. Field recommendations replace the benchmark covariance with residualized, serially dependent, pilot-calibrated, or randomization-based risk. A semi-synthetic Low Carbon London evaluation uses observed half-hourly baseline dynamics and known injected responses to assess design risk. It evaluates the covariance calculations under realistic load autocovariance and identifies when calibrated covariance selection should replace the homoskedastic Markov formula. Near-boundary designs use randomization-first inference when many-spell normal approximations are unsupported.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 54% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strbac, G. and Tindemans, S. H. and Woolf, M. and Bilton, M. and Car… (2024) Low Carbon London Project: Data from the Dynamic Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing Trial, 2013 [data collection] | 0.737 | 3 | 3 | 67% |
| 2 | Aronow, P. M. and Samii, C (2017) Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 | Athey, S. and Eckles, D. and Imbens, G. W (2018) Exact p-values for network interference | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Atkinson, A. C. and Donev, A. N. and Tobias, R. D (2007) Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Barnichon, R. and Brownlees, C (2019) Impulse response estimation by smooth local projections | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Bojinov, I. and Rambachan, A. and Shephard, N (2021) Panel experiments and dynamic causal effects: A finite population perspective | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Bojinov, I. and Shephard, N (2019) Time series experiments and causal estimands: Exact randomization tests and trading | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Bojinov, I. and Simchi-Levi, D. and Zhao, J (2023) Design and analysis of switchback experiments | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Carlson, J. and Shephard, N (2026) When are time series predictions causal? The potential system and dynamic causal effects | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Chaloner, K. and Verdinelli, I (1995) Bayesian experimental design: A review | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 85 scored citations.