EconBase
← All papers

IMF Programs and Growth: A Source-Informed Robustness Reanalysis

Ricardo Alonzo Fernández Salguero

arXiv 5 Jul 2026 · Econometrics

arXiv:2607.04468 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

This article reassesses the meta-analytic evidence on the effect of International Monetary Fund programs on economic growth. The point of departure is the influential meta-analysis by Balima and Sokolova, which assembles 994 estimates from 36 studies and reports a positive average effect with substantial heterogeneity. The reanalysis presented here imposes four stricter requirements. It treats the study, rather than the reported estimate, as the primary inferential unit; it uses a source-informed classification of causal credibility; it models within-study dependence through study aggregation, correlated-effects sensitivity, multilevel CR2 inference, and robust variance estimation; and it evaluates publication-bias sensitivity through Egger, PET, PEESE, WAAP-like top-precision analysis, p-curve diagnostics, trim-and-fill, and exploratory selection models. The central result is not that IMF programs reduce growth everywhere, nor that the true effect is exactly zero. The result is narrower and stronger: the positive average effect in the aggregate literature is not robust once dependence, publication selection, heterogeneity, and credibility of identification are treated as first-order concerns. In the most defensible specifications, the average effect is statistically indistinguishable from zero, while equivalence to a substantively negligible effect is only partially supported and depends on the chosen equivalence bound.

Citation extraction

21
references
38
in-text mentions
21
distinct cited
0
self-citations
5,799
main-text words

appendix boundary found by none_found · 100% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Andrews, Isaiah, and Maximilian Kasy (2019) Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias0.64422100%
2Atoyan, Ruben, and Patrick Conway (2006) Evaluating the Impact of IMF Programs: A Comparison of Matching and Instrumental-Variable Estimators0.64422100%
3Bal-Gunduz, Yasemin (2016) The Economic Impact of Short-Term IMF Engagement in Low-Income Countries0.64422100%
4Balima, Hippolyte W., and Anna Sokolova (2021) IMF Programs and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis0.64422100%
5Barro, Robert J., and Jong-Wha Lee (2005) IMF Programs: Who Is Chosen and What Are the Effects?0.64422100%
6Bas, Muhammet A., and Randall W. Stone (2014) Adverse Selection and Growth under IMF Programs0.64422100%
7Binder, Michael, and Marcel Bluhm (2017) On the Conditional Effects of IMF Program Participation on Output Growth0.64422100%
8Bird, Graham (2001) IMF Programs: Do They Work? Can They Be Made to Work Better?0.64422100%
9Bird, Graham, and Dane Rowlands (2017) The Effect of IMF Programmes on Economic Growth in Low Income Countries: An Empirical Analysis0.64422100%
10Dicks-Mireaux, Louis, Mauro Mecagni, and Susan Schadler (2000) Evaluating the Effect of IMF Lending to Low-Income Countries0.64422100%

Showing the top 10 of 21 scored citations.