Artem Timoshenko, Caio Waisman
arXiv 15 Dec 2025 · Econometrics
arXiv:2512.13400 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
Firms often develop targeting policies to personalize marketing actions and improve incremental profits. Effective targeting depends on accurately separating customers with positive versus negative treatment effects. We propose an approach to estimate the conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) of marketing actions that aligns their estimation with the firm's profit objective. The method recognizes that, for many customers, treatment effects are so extreme that additional accuracy is unlikely to change the recommended actions. However, accuracy matters near the decision boundary, as small errors can alter targeting decisions. By modifying the firm's objective function in the standard profit maximization problem, our method yields a near-optimal targeting policy while simultaneously estimating CATEs. This introduces a new perspective on CATE estimation, reframing it as a problem of profit optimization rather than prediction accuracy. We establish the theoretical properties of the proposed method and demonstrate its performance and trade-offs using synthetic data.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 85% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elmachtoub, Adam N and Grigas, Paul (2022) Smart “predict, then optimize” | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 | Chen, Yi-Wen and Ascarza, Eva and Netzer, Oded (2025) Policy-aware experimentation: Strategic sampling for optimized targeting policies | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 | Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido (2016) Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan (2021) Policy learning with observational data | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Fernández-Loría, Carlos and Provost, Foster (2022) Causal decision making and causal effects estimation are not the same... and why it matters | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Hitsch, Günter J and Misra, Sanjog and Zhang, Walter W (2024) Heterogeneous treatment effects and optimal targeting policy evaluation | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Lu, Haihao and Simester, Duncan and Zhu, Yuting (2025) Optimizing scalable targeted marketing policies with constraints | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Pereyra, Gabriel and Tucker, George and Chorowski, Jan and Kaiser, Ł… (2017) Regularizing neural networks by penalizing confident output distributions | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Künzel, Sören and Sekhon, Jasjeet S and Bickel, Peter J and Yu, Bin (2019) Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 42 scored citations.