EconBase
← All papers

Causal Inference in Financial Event Studies

Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Tianshu Lyu

arXiv 19 Nov 2025 · Econometrics

arXiv:2511.15123 · PDF · Extracted main text

Abstract

Financial event studies, ubiquitous in finance research, typically use linear factor models with known factors to estimate abnormal returns and identify causal effects of information events. This paper demonstrates that when factor models are misspecified -- an almost certain reality -- traditional event study estimators produce inconsistent estimates of treatment effects. The bias is particularly severe during volatile periods, over long horizons, and when event timing correlates with market conditions. We derive precise conditions for identification and expressions for asymptotic bias. As an alternative, we propose synthetic control methods that construct replicating portfolios from control securities without imposing specific factor structures. Revisiting four empirical applications, we show that some established findings may reflect model misspecification rather than true treatment effects. While traditional methods remain reliable for short-horizon studies with random event timing, our results suggest caution when interpreting long-horizon or volatile-period event studies and highlight the importance of quasi-experimental designs when available.

Citation extraction

50
references
115
in-text mentions
50
distinct cited
0
self-citations
16,097
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 70% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Acemoglu, Daron and Johnson, Simon and Kermani, Amir and Kwak, James… (2016) The value of connections in turbulent times: Evidence from the United States0.97112492%
2Xu, Yiqing (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models0.8947471%
3Campbell, J.Y. and Lo, A.W. and MacKinlay, A.C (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets0.87452100%
4Kelly, Bryan T and Pruitt, Seth and Su, Yinan (2019) Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return0.87452100%
5Abadie, Alberto and Diamond, Alexis and Hainmueller, Jens (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program0.84333100%
6Barber, Brad M and Lyon, John D (1997) Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics0.81142100%
7Malmendier, Ulrike and Moretti, Enrico and Peters, Florian S (2018) Winning by losing: Evidence on the long-run effects of mergers0.81142100%
8Ferman, Bruno (2021) On the properties of the synthetic control estimator with many periods and many controls0.7375260%
9Savor, Pavel G and Lu, Qi (2009) Do stock mergers create value for acquirers?0.73732100%
10Shleifer, Andrei (1986) Do demand curves for stocks slope down?0.73732100%

Showing the top 10 of 50 scored citations.