Carlos Montes-Galdón
arXiv 19 Oct 2026 · Econometrics
arXiv:2610.26298 · PDF · Extracted main text
Most empirical models of trend inflation treat it as a latent random walk driven by unobserved shocks, so they cannot say which economic conditions move it. Deep-$π^*$ makes the innovations to the trend a possibly nonlinear function of a large number of macroeconomic indicators, estimated with neural networks, so that Shapley values can be used to attribute every movement of the trend to the indicators behind it. Two complementary loss functions define a current trend, which fits inflation today, and a forward-looking trend, which best predicts inflation over the next year. In US data, employment-related variables were the largest contributors to the post-pandemic rise of the current trend. However, the forward-looking trend rose earlier, with real activity, employment, and money and credit as the main drivers, and peaked eight to twelve months before the current trend. Both trends looked through most of the movements in energy and commodity prices. The contributions of the indicators are nonlinear, with sizeable interactions between them. Re-estimated every month during the surge, the model forecast inflation more accurately than the standard UC-SV model and a random walk, and in early 2021, when professional forecasters expected inflation of 3% or less, the forward-looking trend was already signalling an increase in persistent inflation.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 84% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goulet Coulombe, P., Frenette, M., and Klieber, K (2026) From reactive to proactive volatility modeling with hemisphere neural networks | 1.000 | 5 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 | McCracken, M. W. and Ng, S (2016) FRED-MD: A monthly database for macroeconomic research | 0.928 | 5 | 4 | 80% |
| 3 | Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gome… (2017) Attention is all you need | 0.928 | 4 | 3 | 100% |
| 4 | Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W (2007) Why has U.S. inflation become harder to forecast? | 0.916 | 13 | 7 | 77% |
| 5 | Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W (2016) Core inflation and trend inflation | 0.843 | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 6 | Cogley, T. and Sargent, T. J (2005) Drifts and volatilities: Monetary policies and outcomes in the post WWII US | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Ball, L., Leigh, D., and Mishra, P (2022) Understanding US inflation during the COVID-19 era | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Ball, L. and Mazumder, S (2011) Inflation dynamics and the Great Recession | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Benigno, P. and Eggertsson, G. B (2023) It's baaack: The surge in inflation in the 2020s and the return of the non-linear Phillips curve | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Bernanke, B. S (2007) Inflation expectations and inflation forecasting | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 91 scored citations.