EconBase
← All papers

Surrogate-powered Causal Inference with Censored Outcomes

Yaroslav Mukhin, Tereza Oprea, Arielle Anderer, Christina Lee Yu, Jelena Bradic

arXiv 4 Oct 2026 · Mathematics — Statistics Theory

arXiv:2610.05486 · PDF · Extracted main text

Abstract

Clinical trials with survival endpoints lose information when participants are censored before death is observed. We develop target-preserving estimators that use posttreatment disease history, such as recurrence or progression, to recover information lost to censoring for marginal survival and restricted mean survival effects. The difficulty is that the intermediate event is downstream of treatment: naive adjustment can change the causal estimand, and the useful information enters only through the observed coarsening. We derive observed-data influence functions with and without recurrence history and obtain an exact gain identity. The identity shows that efficiency improvement is driven by the censoring hazard, the split of the alive risk set into recurrence states, and the residual-survival separation between those states. In the no-covariate illness-death model, the Aalen-Johansen estimator realizes the recurrence-augmented efficient score after standardization to the marginal target. With covariates, correctly specified Cox-Breslow transition hazards provide a root-N plug-in benchmark, while a hazard-induced one-step estimator gives rate robustness and, under primitive transition and censoring learner rates, canonical inference with a second-order product remainder. A semi-synthetic metastatic breast cancer study calibrated from digitized progression-free survival and overall survival curves illustrates the gain identity. The framework applies broadly to censored time-to-event studies with informative intermediate histories.

Citation extraction

44
references
75
in-text mentions
44
distinct cited
3
self-citations
11,575
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 22% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Andersen, P. K. and Borgan, Ø. and Gill, R. D. and Keiding, N (1993) Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes0.92843100%
2Buyse, M. and Molenberghs, G. and Burzykowski, T. and Renard, D. and… (2000) The Validation of Surrogate Endpoints in Meta-Analyses of Randomized Experiments0.7373367%
3Moore, T. J. and Zhang, H. and Anderson, G. and Alexander, G. C (2018) Estimated Costs of Pivotal Trials for Novel Therapeutic Agents Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2015–20160.7373367%
4Prentice, R. L (1989) Surrogate Endpoints in Clinical Trials: Definition and Operational Criteria0.7373367%
5Aalen, O. O. and Johansen, S (1978) An Empirical Transition Matrix for Non-Homogeneous Markov Chains Based on Censored Observations0.73732100%
6Robins, J. M. and Rotnitzky, A. and Zhao, L. P (1994) Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors Are Not Always Observed0.73732100%
7Robins, J. M. and Rotnitzky, A. and Zhao, L. P (1995) Analysis of Semiparametric Regression Models for Repeated Outcomes in the Presence of Missing Data0.64441100%
8Neyman, J (1990) On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 90.64422100%
9Rubin, D. B (2005) Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, Decisions0.64422100%
10Conte, P. F. and Baldini, E. and Gardin, G. and Pronzato, P. and Ama… (1996) Chemotherapy with or without Estrogenic Recruitment in Metastatic Breast Cancer. A Randomized Trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Nor…0.5113233%

Showing the top 10 of 44 scored citations.