Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer
arXiv 31 Jul 2026 · Econometrics
arXiv:2607.29532 · PDF · Extracted main text
Because 2SLS is built from sample averages, a small number of observations can have a disproportionate effect on estimates and inference. We introduce W-2SLS, a simple drop-in robustification that replaces these averages by quantile-winsorized means. We analyze W-2SLS under adversarial contamination, which permits both the identities and the reported values of the contaminated observations to depend on the realized clean sample and therefore accommodates targeted or strategic manipulation. Under finite $m$-th moments, W-2SLS attains the minimax-sharp rate $η_{n}^{1-\frac1m}+n^{-1/2}$, where $η_n$ is the fraction of observations that may be altered. Matching lower bounds identify the exact contamination thresholds for uniform consistency, root-$n$ estimation, and centered Gaussian inference with the same first-order law as clean-sample 2SLS. When $\sqrt{n}η_{n}^{1-\frac1m}\to 0$ robustness is first-order free. We also construct feasible heteroskedasticity-robust inference and a winsorized Anderson--Rubin test valid under weak identification and adversarial contamination. Finally, even without contamination, ordinary 2SLS can have poor uniform finite-sample concentration, whereas W-2SLS admits confidence-calibrated sub-Gaussian deviation guarantees.
appendix boundary found by none_found · 100% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kock, A. B. and D. Preinerstorfer (2026) Winsorized mean estimation with heavy tails and adversarial contamination self | 1.000 | 15 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Young, A (2022) Consistency without inference: Instrumental variables in practical application | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 | Angrist, J. D., E. Battistin, and D. Vuri (2017) In a small moment: Class size and moral hazard in the Italian Mezzogiorno | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Catoni, O (2012) Challenging the empirical mean and empirical variance: a deviation study | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Dee, T. S., W. Dobbie, B. A. Jacob, and J. Rockoff (2019) The causes and consequences of test score manipulation: Evidence from the New York regents examinations | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Klooster, J. and M. Zhelonkin (2024) a): Outlier robust inference in the instrumental variable model with applications to causal effects | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Brodeur, A., M. Lé, M. Sangnier, and Y. Zylberberg (2016) Star wars: The empirics strike back | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 | Forneron, J.-J (2023) Occasionally misspecified | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 9 | Rohatgi, D. and V. Syrgkanis (2022) Robust generalized method of moments: a finite sample viewpoint | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | Wooldridge, J (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 53 scored citations.