arXiv 24 Jul 2026 · Econometrics
arXiv:2607.22896 · PDF · Extracted main text
Causal forests that estimate conditional average treatment effects by averaging honest leaf-level effects across trees are widely used in fixed-effects panel settings. We show that this averaging systematically attenuates the estimated heterogeneity: the raw prediction behaves like a + b*tau(x) with slope b < 1, so the spread of the CATEs is compressed toward the average effect, and the additive recentering used to report an unbiased average treatment effect does not fix it. Benchmarking against a similarity-weight generalized random forest on the same within-transformed signal, we find both estimators attenuate but the leaf-averaging construction attenuates materially more. We characterize how b moves with the design, worsening with lower signal-to-noise, smaller panels, and higher dimension; this diagnosis is our main contribution. As a remedy we adapt the best-linear-predictor calibration of Chernozhukov et al., estimating the de-attenuation slope out-of-bag so that it is self-contained within the observational panel and asymptotically inert under a homogeneous effect. In simulations the correction cuts CATE mean-squared error by 25-42% relative to the recentering default; on a standard county minimum-wage panel the attenuation is present but mild and the correction restores the imposed spread. We ship the method in the causalfe Python package.
appendix boundary found by none_found · 100% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Victor Chernozhukov, Mert Demirer, Esther Duflo, and Iván Fernández-… Fisher–schultz lecture: Generic machine learning inference on heterogeneous treatment effects in randomized experiments, with an… | 1.000 | 5 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 | Susan Athey, Julie Tibshirani, and Stefan Wager (2019) Generalized random forests | 0.843 | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 3 | Brantly Callaway and Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna (2020) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods | 0.843 | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 4 | Stefan Wager and Susan Athey (2017) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests | 0.843 | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 5 | Susan Athey and Stefan Wager (2019) Estimating treatment effects with causal forests: An application | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Susan Athey and Guido Imbens (2016) Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Lars van der Laan, Ernesto Ulloa-Pérez, Marco Carone, and Alex Luedtke (2023) Causal isotonic calibration for heterogeneous treatment effects | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Mark A. C. Kattenberg, Bas J. Scheer, and Jurre H. Thiel (2023) Causal forests with fixed effects for treatment effect heterogeneity in difference-in-differences | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Yan Leng and Drew Dimmery (2022) Calibration of heterogeneous treatment effects in randomized experiments | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | Evelina Gavrilova, Audun Langrgen, and Floris T. Zoutman (2025) Difference-in-difference causal forests, with an application to payroll tax incidence in norway | 0.405 | 1 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 11 scored citations.