EconBase
← All papers

Algorithm or Creative? A Three-Arm Experimental Design for Decomposing Algorithmic Bias in Platform A/B Tests

Pallavi Pal, Anjana Susarla

arXiv 22 May 2026 · Econometrics

arXiv:2605.23706 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Online advertising platforms host hundreds of thousands of A/B tests, but the platform's delivery algorithm routes each creative to the audience it predicts will engage. Every two-arm test therefore conflates the creative's effect with the algorithm's targeting response, and adjusting for the realized audience is biased because audience is a post-treatment mediator. We propose a three-arm design that adds an arm exposing the algorithm to the treatment metadata while holding the user-facing creative identical to control, point-identifying the natural indirect (algorithmic) and direct (creative) effects without sequential ignorability. In a live Meta campaign with a women-targeted text fragment, the algorithmic channel raises female impression share by +2.07 ppt while the creative channel moves it by -0.68 ppt; roughly three-quarters of the absolute reallocation is algorithmic, and a conventional two-arm test understates the algorithmic channel by a factor of two. The design isolates the contribution of platform's algorithm to the outcome which is separable from creative content.

Citation extraction

36
references
89
in-text mentions
36
distinct cited
0
self-citations
7,728
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 70% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Judea Pearl (2001) Direct and indirect effects1.00073100%
2Alan S. Gerber and Donald P. Green (2012) Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation1.00063100%
3Kosuke Imai, Dustin Tingley, and Teppei Yamamoto (2013) Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanisms1.00063100%
4Gordon Burtch, Robert Moakler, Brett R. Gordon, Poppy Zhang, and Sha… (2025) Characterizing and minimizing divergent delivery in Meta advertising experiments0.9568488%
5Avidit Acharya, Matthew Blackwell, and Maya Sen (2016) Explaining causal findings without bias: Detecting and assessing direct effects0.92843100%
6James M. Robins and Sander Greenland (1992) Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects0.92843100%
7Tyler J. VanderWeele (2015) Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction0.81142100%
8Muhammad Ali, Piotr Sapieżyński, Miranda Bogen, Aleksandra Korolova,… (2019) Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes0.73732100%
9Reuben M. Baron and David A. Kenny (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerati…0.73732100%
10Kosuke Imai, Luke Keele, and Dustin Tingley (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis0.73732100%

Showing the top 10 of 36 scored citations.