Niklas Bengtsson, Per Engström
arXiv 23 Mar 2026 · Statistics — Methodology
arXiv:2603.21917 · PDF · Extracted main text
A growing literature shows that two-stage least squares (2SLS) with multiple treatments yields coefficients that are difficult to interpret under heterogeneous treatment effects and cross-effects in the first stage. We show that in capacity-constrained allocation systems, these cross-effects are not a nuisance but the source of a clean policy interpretation. When treatments are rationed and the instrument operates on the same margin as the policy of interest, the 2SLS coefficient $β_k$ equals the total societal effect of expanding treatment $k$ by one slot, including all cascading reallocations through the system. The mechanism is general: it applies whenever fixed supply constrains allocation, whether through ranked queues, waitlists, or market-clearing prices. This cascade identity $\mathbf{T} = \mathbfβ$ holds for any first-stage matrix, under arbitrary treatment effect heterogeneity, and requires only instrument relevance and that the instrument operates on the same margin as the policy. The result applies to university admissions, school choice, medical residency matching, public housing, and other rationed allocation settings. We provide an empirical application using lottery-based admission to Swedish university programs and charitable giving as the outcome.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 14% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lars J. Kirkebøen and Edwin Leuven and Magne Mogstad (2016) Field of Study, Earnings, and Self-Selection | 0.909 | 8 | 5 | 75% |
| 2 | Gandil, Mikkel Høst (2025) Trickle Down Education: Ripple Effects in College Admissions | 0.843 | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 3 | Kline, Patrick and Walters, Christopher R (2016) Evaluating Public Programs with Close Substitutes: The Case of Head Start | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Adam Altmejd and Andrés Barrios-Fernández and Marin Drlje and Joshua… (2021) O Brother, Where Start Thou? Sibling Spillovers on College and Major Choice in Four Countries | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Bleemer, Zachary and Mehta, Aashish (2022) Will Studying Economics Make You Rich? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of the Returns to College Major | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Carneiro, Pedro and Heckman, James J. and Vytlacil, Edward (2010) Evaluating Marginal Policy Changes and the Average Effect of Treatment for Individuals at the Margin | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Haavelmo, Trygve (1943) The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Joshua D. Angrist and Jörn-Steffen Pischke (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion | 0.511 | 2 | 2 | 50% |
| 9 | Yoram Bauman and Elaina Rose (2011) Selection or Indoctrination: Why Do Economics Students Donate Less Than the Rest? | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | Frank, Robert H. and Gilovich, Thomas and Regan, Dennis T (1993) Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation? | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 45 scored citations.