EconBase
← All papers

The Privacy-Utility Trade-Off of Location Tracking in Ad Personalization

Mohammad Mosaffa, Omid Rafieian

arXiv 12 Mar 2026 · Econometrics

arXiv:2603.12374 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Firms collect vast amounts of behavioral and geographical data on individuals. While behavioral data captures an individual's digital footprint, geographical data reflects their physical footprint. Given the significant privacy risks associated with combining these data sources, it is crucial to understand their respective value and whether they act as complements or substitutes in achieving firms' business objectives. In this paper, we combine economic theory, machine learning, and causal inference to quantify the value of geographical data, the extent to which behavioral data can substitute for it, and the mechanisms through which it benefits firms. Using data from a leading in-app advertising platform in a large Asian country, we document that geographical data is most valuable in the early cold-start stage, when behavioral histories are limited. In this stage, geographical data complements behavioral data, improving targeting performance by almost 20%. As users accumulate richer behavioral histories, however, the role of geographical data shifts: it becomes largely substitutable, as behavioral data alone captures the relevant heterogeneity. These results highlight a central privacy-utility trade-off in ad personalization and inform managerial decisions about when location tracking creates value.

Citation extraction

49
references
73
in-text mentions
49
distinct cited
3
self-citations
17,815
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 68% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Omid Rafieian and Hema Yoganarasimhan (2023) Ai and personalization self0.92843100%
2Eva Ascarza (2018) Retention futility: Targeting high-risk customers might be ineffective0.84333100%
3Omid Rafieian and Hema Yoganarasimhan (2021) Targeting and privacy in mobile advertising self0.7946550%
4Daniel F McCaffrey, Beth Ann Griffin, Daniel Almirall, Mary Ellen Sl… (2013) A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models0.7374350%
5Tilman Börgers, Angel Hernando-Veciana, and Daniel Krähmer (2013) When are signals complements or substitutes?0.73732100%
6Massimo Quadrana, Paolo Cremonesi, and Dietmar Jannach (2018) Sequence-aware recommender systems0.6443267%
7Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jo… (2017) Attention is all you need0.6443267%
8Yves-Alexandre De Montjoye, César A Hidalgo, Michel Verleysen, and V… (2013) Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility0.64422100%
9Robert C Geary (1954) The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping0.64422100%
10Vahab Mirrokni, S Muthukrishnan, and Uri Nadav (2010) Quasi-proportional mechanisms: Prior-free revenue maximization0.64422100%

Showing the top 10 of 49 scored citations.