EconBase
← All papers

Hippocratic Utility

Tomasz Strzalecki

arXiv 6 Mar 2026 · Econometrics

arXiv:2603.06820 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

A utility function has been proposed that values more those lives that are saved by not imposing a harmful treatment and values less those lives that could be saved by treating people who would otherwise die. I do not dispute the ethical motivation behind this kind of asymmetry. However, as my example illustrates, the scope of applicability of such a decision criterion may be limited.

Citation extraction

11
references
14
in-text mentions
11
distinct cited
0
self-citations
1,752
main-text words

appendix boundary found by none_found · 100% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Ben-Michael, Eli and Imai, Kosuke and Jiang, Zhichao (2024) Policy learning with asymmetric counterfactual utilities0.64422100%
2Gelman, Andrew and Mikhaeil, Jonas (2024) Russian roulette: Why you can have a deterministic potential-outcome framework, or an asymmetric utility function, but not both0.58531100%
3Imbens, Guido W and Angrist, Joshua D (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects0.40511100%
4Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk0.40511100%
5Christy, Neil and Kowalski, Amanda Ellen (2024) Starting small: prioritizing safety over efficacy in randomized experiments using the exact finite sample likelihood0.40511100%
6Koch, Benedikt and Imai, Kosuke (2025) Statistical decision theory with counterfactual loss0.40511100%
7Neyman, Jerzy (1923) On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles0.40511100%
8Pearl, Judea (1999) Probabilities of causation: three counterfactual interpretations and their identification0.40511100%
9Rubin, Donald B (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.0.40511100%
10Samuelson, William and Zeckhauser, Richard (1988) Status quo bias in decision making0.40511100%

Showing the top 10 of 11 scored citations.