Model Selection in High-Dimensional Linear Regression using Boosting with Multiple Testing

George Kapetanios, Vasilis Sarafidis, Alexia Ventouri

arXiv 23 Feb 2026 · Econometrics

arXiv:2602.19705 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

High-dimensional regression specification and analysis is a complex and active area of research in statistics, machine learning, and econometrics. This paper proposes a new approach, Boosting with Multiple Testing (BMT), which combines forward stepwise variable selection with the multiple testing framework of Chudik et al (2018). At each stage, the model is updated by adding only the most significant regressor conditional on those already included, while a family-wise multiple testing filter is applied to the remaining candidates. In this way, the method retains the strong screening properties of Chudik et al (2018) while operating in a less greedy manner with respect to proxy and noise variables. Using sharp probability inequalities for heterogeneous strongly mixing processes from Dendramis et al (2022), we show that BMT enjoys oracle type properties relative to an approximating model that includes all true signals and excludes pure noise variables: this model is selected with probability tending to one, and the resulting estimator achieves standard parametric rates for prediction error and coefficient estimation. Additional results establish conditions under which BMT recovers the exact true model and avoids selection of proxy signals. Monte Carlo experiments indicate that BMT performs very well relative to OCMT and Lasso type procedures, delivering higher model selection accuracy and smaller RMSE for the estimated coefficients, especially under strong multicollinearity of the regressors. Two empirical illustrations based on a large set of macro-financial indicators as covariates, show that BMT yields sparse, interpretable specifications with favourable out-of-sample performance.

Citation extraction

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 55% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

Showing the top 10 of 40 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.