arXiv 1 Nov 2025 · Econometrics
arXiv:2511.00612 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
This paper develops a method to conduct causal inference in the presence of unobserved confounders by leveraging networks with homophily, a frequently observed tendency to form edges with similar nodes. I introduce a concept of asymptotic homophily, according to which individuals' selectivity scales with the size of the potential connection pool. It contributes to the network formation literature with a model that can accommodate common empirical features such as homophily, degree heterogeneity, sparsity, and clustering, and provides a framework to obtain consistent estimators of treatment effects that are robust to selection on unobservables. I also consider an alternative setting that accommodates dense networks and show how selecting linked individuals whose observed characteristics made such a connection less likely delivers an estimator with similar properties. In an application, I recover an estimate of the effect of parental involvement on students' test scores that is greater than that of OLS, arguably due to the estimator's ability to account for unobserved ability.
appendix boundary found by appendix_titled_section at “Appendix A: Proofs” · 61% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brian B Boutwell, Ryan C Meldrum \ Melissa A Petkovsek (2017) General intelligence in friendship selection: A study of preadolescent best friend dyads | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 | ML Clark \ Marla Ayers (1992) Friendship similarity during early adolescence: Gender and racial patterns | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 | Matthew O Jackson (2010) Social and economic networks. Princeton university press | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Eric Auerbach (2022) Identification and estimation of a partially linear regression model using network data | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Simon Burgess, Eleanor Sanderson, Marcela Umaña-Aponte et al (2011) School ties: An analysis of homophily in an adolescent friendship network. Centre for Market and Public Organisation | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Bryan S Graham (2017) An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Mark Newman (2018) Networks. Oxford university press | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Andrei Zeleneev (2020) Identification and estimation of network models with nonparametric unobserved heterogeneity | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Wolfgang Dauth, Sebastian Findeisen, Enrico Moretti \ Jens Suedekum (2022) Matching in cities | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Andreas Dzemski (2019) An empirical model of dyadic link formation in a network with unobserved heterogeneity | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 39 scored citations.
arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.
| Citing paper | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peer effect analysis with latent processes | 0.405 | 1 | 1 |