EconBase
← All papers

Propensity score with factor loadings: the effect of the Paris Agreement

Angelo Forino, Andrea Mercatanti, Giacomo Morelli

arXiv 11 Jul 2025 · Econometrics

arXiv:2507.08764 · PDF · Extracted main text

Abstract

Factor models for longitudinal data, where policy adoption is unconfounded with respect to a low-dimensional set of latent factor loadings, have become increasingly popular for causal inference. Most existing approaches, however, rely on a causal finite-sample approach or computationally intensive methods, limiting their applicability and external validity. In this paper, we propose a novel causal inference method for panel data based on inverse propensity score weighting where the propensity score is a function of latent factor loadings within a framework of causal inference from super-population. The approach relaxes the traditional restrictive assumptions of causal panel methods, while offering advantages in terms of causal interpretability, policy relevance, and computational efficiency. Under standard assumptions, we outline a three-step estimation procedure for the ATT and derive its large-sample properties using Mestimation theory. We apply the method to assess the causal effect of the Paris Agreement, a policy aimed at fostering the transition to a low-carbon economy, on European stock returns. Our empirical results suggest a statistically significant and negative short-run effect on the stock returns of firms that issued green bonds.

Citation extraction

45
references
61
in-text mentions
45
distinct cited
0
self-citations
6,998
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 65% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1J. Bai and S. Ng (2013) Principal components estimation and identification of static factors0.8307357%
2Y. Xu (2023) Causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data: A reflection0.73732100%
3Y. Xu (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models0.73732100%
4P. Bolton and M. Kacperczyk (2021) Do investors care about carbon risk?0.64422100%
5C. Flammer (2021) Corporate green bonds0.64422100%
6L. Gobillon and T. Magnac (2016) Regional policy evaluation: Interactive fixed effects and synthetic controls0.64422100%
7L. H. Pedersen, S. Fitzgibbons, and L. Pomorski (2021) Responsible investing: The esg-efficient frontier0.64422100%
8C. Hsiao, S. Ching, and S. K. Wan (2012) A panel data approach for program evaluation: Measuring the benefits of political and economic integration of hong kong with mai…0.51121100%
9D. B. Rubin (1978) Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization0.51121100%
10M. Amjad, D. Shah, and D. Shen (2015) Robust synthetic control0.40511100%

Showing the top 10 of 45 scored citations.