Angelo Forino, Andrea Mercatanti, Giacomo Morelli
arXiv 11 Jul 2025 · Econometrics
arXiv:2507.08764 · PDF · Extracted main text
Factor models for longitudinal data, where policy adoption is unconfounded with respect to a low-dimensional set of latent factor loadings, have become increasingly popular for causal inference. Most existing approaches, however, rely on a causal finite-sample approach or computationally intensive methods, limiting their applicability and external validity. In this paper, we propose a novel causal inference method for panel data based on inverse propensity score weighting where the propensity score is a function of latent factor loadings within a framework of causal inference from super-population. The approach relaxes the traditional restrictive assumptions of causal panel methods, while offering advantages in terms of causal interpretability, policy relevance, and computational efficiency. Under standard assumptions, we outline a three-step estimation procedure for the ATT and derive its large-sample properties using Mestimation theory. We apply the method to assess the causal effect of the Paris Agreement, a policy aimed at fostering the transition to a low-carbon economy, on European stock returns. Our empirical results suggest a statistically significant and negative short-run effect on the stock returns of firms that issued green bonds.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 65% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J. Bai and S. Ng (2013) Principal components estimation and identification of static factors | 0.830 | 7 | 3 | 57% |
| 2 | Y. Xu (2023) Causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data: A reflection | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 | Y. Xu (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | P. Bolton and M. Kacperczyk (2021) Do investors care about carbon risk? | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | C. Flammer (2021) Corporate green bonds | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | L. Gobillon and T. Magnac (2016) Regional policy evaluation: Interactive fixed effects and synthetic controls | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | L. H. Pedersen, S. Fitzgibbons, and L. Pomorski (2021) Responsible investing: The esg-efficient frontier | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | C. Hsiao, S. Ching, and S. K. Wan (2012) A panel data approach for program evaluation: Measuring the benefits of political and economic integration of hong kong with mai… | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 9 | D. B. Rubin (1978) Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | M. Amjad, D. Shah, and D. Shen (2015) Robust synthetic control | 0.405 | 1 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 45 scored citations.