arXiv 30 Jun 2025 · Econometrics
arXiv:2507.00307 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
When conducting inference for the average treatment effect on the treated with a Synthetic Control Estimator, the vector of control weights is a nuisance parameter which is often constrained, high-dimensional, and may be only partially identified even when the average treatment effect on the treated is point-identified. All three of these features of a nuisance parameter can lead to failure of asymptotic normality for the estimate of the parameter of interest when using standard methods. I provide a new method yielding asymptotic normality for an estimate of the parameter of interest, even when all three of these complications are present. This is accomplished by first estimating the nuisance parameter using a regularization penalty to achieve a form of identification, and then estimating the parameter of interest using moment conditions that have been orthogonalized with respect to the nuisance parameter. I present high-level sufficient conditions for the estimator and verify these conditions in an example involving Synthetic Controls.
appendix boundary found by appendix_titled_section at “Appendix A” · 67% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chernozhukov, Wüthrich, and Zhu (2024) A t-test for synthetic controls | 1.000 | 12 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 | Sun (2013) A heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust F test using an orthonormal series variance estimator | 0.899 | 11 | 3 | 73% |
| 3 | Andersson (2019) Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study | 0.874 | 10 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller (2010) Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program | 0.874 | 9 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Cao and Dowd (2019) Estimation and Inference for Synthetic Control Methods with Spillover Effects | 0.874 | 6 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Chernozhukov, Hong, and Tamer (2007) Estimation and Confidence Regions for Parameter Sets in Econometric Models1 | 0.874 | 5 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Li (2020) Statistical Inference for Average Treatment Effects Estimated by Synthetic Control Methods | 0.874 | 5 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Andrews and Cheng (2012) Estimation and Inference With Weak, Semi-Strong, and Strong Identification | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Chernozhukov, Wüthrich, and Zhu (2021) An Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Method for Counterfactual and Synthetic Controls | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Carvalho, Masini, and Medeiros (2018) ArCo: An artificial counterfactual approach for high-dimensional panel time-series data | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 59 scored citations.