EconBase
← All papers

Opening the Black Box of Local Projections

Philippe Goulet Coulombe, Karin Klieber

arXiv 18 May 2025 · Econometrics · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:2505.12422 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Local projections (LPs) are widely used in empirical macroeconomics to estimate impulse responses to policy interventions. Yet, in many ways, they are black boxes. It is often unclear what mechanism or historical episodes drive a particular estimate. We introduce a new decomposition of LP estimates into the sum of contributions of historical events, which is the product, for each time stamp, of a weight and the realization of the response variable. In the least squares case, we show that these weights admit two interpretations. First, they represent purified and standardized shocks. Second, they serve as proximity scores between the projected policy intervention and past interventions in the sample. Notably, this second interpretation extends naturally to machine learning methods, many of which yield impulse responses that, while nonlinear in predictors, still aggregate past outcomes linearly via proximity-based weights. Applying this framework to shocks in monetary and fiscal policy, global temperature, and the excess bond premium, we find that easily identifiable events-such as Nixon's interference with the Fed, stagflation, World War II, and the Mount Agung volcanic eruption-emerge as dominant drivers of often heavily concentrated impulse response estimates.

Citation extraction

83
references
197
in-text mentions
112
distinct cited
3
self-citations
20,891
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 84% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H (2004) A new measure of monetary shocks: Derivation and implications1.00094100%
2Bilal, A. and Känzig, D. R (2024) The macroeconomic impact of climate change: Global vs. local temperature1.00063100%
3Mumtaz, H. and Piffer, M (2022) Impulse response estimation via flexible local projections0.92843100%
4Kolesár, M. and Plagborg-Mller, M (2024) Dynamic causal effects in a nonlinear world: the good, the bad, and the ugly0.84333100%
5Ramey, V. A. and Zubairy, S (2018) Government spending multipliers in good times and in bad: evidence from us historical data0.83014557%
6Goulet Coulombe, P., Göbel, M., and Klieber, K (2024) Dual interpretation of machine learning forecasts self0.81142100%
7Goulet Coulombe, P (2025) Ordinary least squares as an attention mechanism0.73732100%
8Goulet Coulombe, P., Rapach, D., Schütte, E. C. M., and Schwenk-Nebb… (2023) The anatomy of machine learning-based portfolio performance0.73732100%
9Bernanke, B. S., Boivin, J., and Eliasz, P (2005) Measuring the effects of monetary policy: a factor-augmented vector autoregressive (favar) approach0.73732100%
10Goncalves, S., Herrera, A. M., Kilian, L., and Pesavento, E (2024) State-dependent local projections0.73732100%

Showing the top 10 of 112 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
10.29cm 22.5524 dpd Ordinary Least Squares as an Attention Mechanism . 0.25cm0.40511