Akanksha Negi, Didier Nibbering
arXiv 8 Jan 2025 · Econometrics
arXiv:2501.04853 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
This paper presents a general difference-in-differences framework for identifying path-dependent treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed. We introduce a novel robust estimator that adjusts for missing histories using a combination of outcome, propensity score, and missing treatment models. We show that this approach identifies the target parameter as long as any two of the three models are correctly specified. The method delivers improved robustness against competing alternatives under the same set of identifying assumptions. Theoretical results and numerical experiments demonstrate how the proposed method yields more accurate inference compared to conventional and doubly robust estimators, particularly under nontrivial missingness and misspecification scenarios. Two applications demonstrate that the robust method can produce substantively different estimates of path-dependent treatment effects relative to conventional approaches.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 38% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sant2020doubly | unmatched citation key sant2020doubly | 0.928 | 5 | 3 | 80% |
| vermeulen2015bias | unmatched citation key vermeulen2015bias | 0.737 | 3 | 3 | 67% |
| callaway2021difference | unmatched citation key callaway2021difference | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| ghanem2024correcting | unmatched citation key ghanem2024correcting | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| pepper2001response | unmatched citation key pepper2001response | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| hull2018estimating | unmatched citation key hull2018estimating | 0.511 | 2 | 2 | 50% |
| molinari2010missing | unmatched citation key molinari2010missing | 0.511 | 2 | 2 | 50% |
| bellego2024chained | unmatched citation key bellego2024chained | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| callaway2023evaluating | unmatched citation key callaway2023evaluating | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| zhang2016causal | unmatched citation key zhang2016causal | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 72 scored citations. 10 of these could not be matched to a bibliography entry, so only the citation key is shown.