EconBase
← All papers

Identification of dynamic treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed

Akanksha Negi, Didier Nibbering

arXiv 8 Jan 2025 · Econometrics

arXiv:2501.04853 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

This paper presents a general difference-in-differences framework for identifying path-dependent treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed. We introduce a novel robust estimator that adjusts for missing histories using a combination of outcome, propensity score, and missing treatment models. We show that this approach identifies the target parameter as long as any two of the three models are correctly specified. The method delivers improved robustness against competing alternatives under the same set of identifying assumptions. Theoretical results and numerical experiments demonstrate how the proposed method yields more accurate inference compared to conventional and doubly robust estimators, particularly under nontrivial missingness and misspecification scenarios. Two applications demonstrate that the robust method can produce substantively different estimates of path-dependent treatment effects relative to conventional approaches.

Citation extraction

3
references
87
in-text mentions
72
distinct cited
0
self-citations
12,199
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 38% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
sant2020doublyunmatched citation key sant2020doubly0.9285380%
vermeulen2015biasunmatched citation key vermeulen2015bias0.7373367%
callaway2021differenceunmatched citation key callaway2021difference0.73732100%
ghanem2024correctingunmatched citation key ghanem2024correcting0.64422100%
pepper2001responseunmatched citation key pepper2001response0.64422100%
hull2018estimatingunmatched citation key hull2018estimating0.5112250%
molinari2010missingunmatched citation key molinari2010missing0.5112250%
bellego2024chainedunmatched citation key bellego2024chained0.51121100%
callaway2023evaluatingunmatched citation key callaway2023evaluating0.51121100%
zhang2016causalunmatched citation key zhang2016causal0.51121100%

Showing the top 10 of 72 scored citations. 10 of these could not be matched to a bibliography entry, so only the citation key is shown.