EconBase
← All papers

How to Compare Copula Forecasts?

Tobias Fissler, Yannick Hoga

arXiv 5 Oct 2024 · Statistics — Methodology · publishedJournal of Business and Economic Statistics (2026)

arXiv:2410.04165 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

This paper lays out a principled approach to compare copula forecasts via strictly consistent scores. We first establish the negative result that, in general, copulas fail to be elicitable, implying that copula predictions cannot sensibly be compared on their own. A notable exception is on Fr\'echet classes, that is, when the marginal distribution structure is given and fixed, in which case we give suitable scores for the copula forecast comparison. As a remedy for the general non-elicitability of copulas, we establish novel multi-objective scores for copula forecast along with marginal forecasts. They give rise to two-step tests of equal or superior predictive ability which admit attribution of the forecast ranking to the accuracy of the copulas or the marginals. Simulations show that our two-step tests work well in terms of size and power. We illustrate our new methodology via an empirical example using copula forecasts for international stock market indices.

Citation extraction

42
references
78
in-text mentions
42
distinct cited
3
self-citations
11,987
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 86% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Fissler, T. and Hoga, Y (2024) Backtesting systemic risk forecasts using multi-objective elicitability self1.00073100%
2Gneiting, T (2011) Making and evaluating point forecasts1.00063100%
3Diebold, F. X. and Mariano, R. S (1995) Comparing predictive accuracy1.00054100%
4Giacomini, R. and White, H (2006) Tests of conditional predictive ability0.8434375%
5Creal, D., Koopman, S. J., and Lucas, A (2013) Generalized autoregressive score models with applications0.81142100%
6Osband, K. H (1985) Providing Incentives for Better Cost Forecasting0.81142100%
7Sklar, A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à $n$ dimensions et leurs marges0.81142100%
8Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A. E (2007) Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation0.73732100%
9Chen, X. and Fan, Y (2006) Estimation and model selection of semiparametric copula-based multivariate dynamic models under copula misspecification0.64422100%
10Coroneo, L. and Iacone, F (2020) Comparing predictive accuracy in small samples using fixed-smoothing asymptotics0.64422100%

Showing the top 10 of 42 scored citations.