Katerina Chrysikou, George Kapetanios
arXiv 28 Jul 2024 · Econometrics
arXiv:2407.19509 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
In this paper we examine the existence of heterogeneity within a group, in panels with latent grouping structure. The assumption of within group homogeneity is prevalent in this literature, implying that the formation of groups alleviates cross-sectional heterogeneity, regardless of the prior knowledge of groups. While the latter hypothesis makes inference powerful, it can be often restrictive. We allow for models with richer heterogeneity that can be found both in the cross-section and within a group, without imposing the simple assumption that all groups must be heterogeneous. We further contribute to the method proposed by \cite{su2016identifying}, by showing that the model parameters can be consistently estimated and the groups, while unknown, can be identifiable in the presence of different types of heterogeneity. Within the same framework we consider the validity of assuming both cross-sectional and within group homogeneity, using testing procedures. Simulations demonstrate good finite-sample performance of the approach in both classification and estimation, while empirical applications across several datasets provide evidence of multiple clusters, as well as reject the hypothesis of within group homogeneity.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 49% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tibshirani, R., G. Walther, and T. Hastie (2002, 01) (2002) Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic | 1.000 | 6 | 4 | 100% |
| 2 | Su, L., Z. Shi, and P. C. Phillips (2016) Identifying latent structures in panel data | 0.920 | 9 | 7 | 78% |
| 3 | Pollard, D (1981) Strong Consistency of $K$-Means Clustering | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Su, L., X. Wang, and S. Jin (2019) Sieve estimation of time-varying panel data models with latent structures | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Phillips, P. C. and D. Sul (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 6 | Su, L. and G. Ju (2018) Identifying latent grouped patterns in panel data models with interactive fixed effects | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 7 | Bester, C. A. and C. B. Hansen (2016) Grouped effects estimators in fixed effects models | 0.405 | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 | Ando, T. and J. Bai (2016) Panel data models with grouped factor structure under unknown group membership | 0.405 | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 9 | Bai, J (2009) Panel data models with interactive fixed effects | 0.405 | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | Bai, J., S. H. Choi, and Y. Liao (2024) Standard errors for panel data models with unknown clusters | 0.405 | 1 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 47 scored citations.