arXiv 17 Apr 2024 · Econometrics
arXiv:2404.11739 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
Economists are often interested in the mechanisms by which a treatment affects an outcome. We develop tests for the "sharp null of full mediation" that a treatment $D$ affects an outcome $Y$ only through a particular mechanism (or set of mechanisms) $M$. Our approach exploits connections between mediation analysis and the econometric literature on testing instrument validity. We also provide tools for quantifying the magnitude of alternative mechanisms when the sharp null is rejected: we derive sharp lower bounds on the fraction of individuals whose outcome is affected by the treatment despite having the same value of $M$ under both treatments (“always-takers”), as well as sharp bounds on the average effect of the treatment for such always-takers. An advantage of our approach relative to existing tools for mediation analysis is that it does not require stringent assumptions about how $M$ is assigned. We illustrate our methodology in two empirical applications.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 60% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bursztyn, González and Yanagizawa-Drott (2020) Misperceived Social Norms: Women Working Outside the Home in Saudi Arabia | 0.952 | 22 | 5 | 86% |
| 2 | Kitagawa (2015) A Test for Instrument Validity | 0.950 | 7 | 4 | 86% |
| 3 | Baranov, Bhalotra, Biroli and Maselko (2020) Maternal Depression, Women's Empowerment, and Parental Investment: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial | 0.892 | 31 | 5 | 71% |
| 4 | Cox and Shi (2022) Simple Adaptive Size-Exact Testing for Full-Vector and Subvector Inference in Moment Inequality Models | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Mourifié and Wan (2017) Testing Local Average Treatment Effect Assumptions | 0.754 | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 6 | Andrews, Roth and Pakes (2023) Inference for Linear Conditional Moment Inequalities | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Fang, Santos, Shaikh and Torgovitsky (2023) Inference for Large-Scale Linear Systems With Known Coefficients | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Huber and Mellace (2015) Testing Instrument Validity for Late Identification Based on Inequality Moment Constraints | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Kédagni and Mourifié (2020) Generalized instrumental inequalities: testing the instrumental variable independence assumption | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Sun (2023) Instrument validity for heterogeneous causal effects | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 52 scored citations.