EconBase
← All papers

Simulation Experiments as a Causal Problem

Tyrel Stokes, Ian Shrier, Russell Steele

arXiv 21 Aug 2023 · Statistics — Methodology

arXiv:2308.10823 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Simulation methods are among the most ubiquitous methodological tools in statistical science. In particular, statisticians often is simulation to explore properties of statistical functionals in models for which developed statistical theory is insufficient or to assess finite sample properties of theoretical results. We show that the design of simulation experiments can be viewed from the perspective of causal intervention on a data generating mechanism. We then demonstrate the use of causal tools and frameworks in this context. Our perspective is agnostic to the particular domain of the simulation experiment which increases the potential impact of our proposed approach. In this paper, we consider two illustrative examples. First, we re-examine a predictive machine learning example from a popular textbook designed to assess the relationship between mean function complexity and the mean-squared error. Second, we discuss a traditional causal inference method problem, simulating the effect of unmeasured confounding on estimation, specifically to illustrate bias amplification. In both cases, applying causal principles and using graphical models with parameters and distributions as nodes in the spirit of influence diagrams can 1) make precise which estimand the simulation targets , 2) suggest modifications to better attain the simulation goals, and 3) provide scaffolding to discuss performance criteria for a particular simulation design.

Citation extraction

22
references
61
in-text mentions
22
distinct cited
1
self-citations
15,559
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 91% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1barticle[author] Buja, AndreasA., Brown, LawrenceL., Kuchibhotla, Ar… (2019) )0.92843100%
2barticle[author] Stokes, TyrelT., Steele, RussellR. Shrier, IanI (2022) ) self0.874182100%
3bbook[author] Hastie, TrevorT., Tibshirani, RobertR., Friedman, Jero… (2009) )0.87462100%
4barticle[author] Pearl, JudeaJ (2011) )0.87452100%
5barticle[author] Myers, Jessica A.J. A., Rassen, Jeremy A.J. A., Gag… (2011) )0.81142100%
6barticle[author] Buja, AndreasA., Brown, LawrenceL., Berk, RichardR.… (2019) )0.73732100%
7barticle[author] Dawid, A PhilipA. P (2002) )0.73732100%
8barticle[author] Pearl, JudeaJ (2012) )0.73732100%
9barticle[author] Garud, Sushant S.S. S., Karimi, Iftekhar A.I. A. Kr… (2017) )0.51121100%
10barticle[author] VanderWeele, Tyler J.T. J. Ding, PengP (2017) )0.40511100%

Showing the top 10 of 22 scored citations.