EconBase
← All papers

Functional Differencing in Networks

Stéphane Bonhomme, Kevin Dano

arXiv 21 Jul 2023 · Econometrics · publishedRevue économique (2024)

arXiv:2307.11484 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Economic interactions often occur in networks where heterogeneous agents (such as workers or firms) sort and produce. However, most existing estimation approaches either require the network to be dense, which is at odds with many empirical networks, or they require restricting the form of heterogeneity and the network formation process. We show how the functional differencing approach introduced by Bonhomme (2012) in the context of panel data, can be applied in network settings to derive moment restrictions on model parameters and average effects. Those restrictions are valid irrespective of the form of heterogeneity, and they hold in both dense and sparse networks. We illustrate the analysis with linear and nonlinear models of matched employer-employee data, in the spirit of the model introduced by Abowd, Kramarz, and Margolis (1999).

Citation extraction

51
references
103
in-text mentions
51
distinct cited
4
self-citations
10,363
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 83% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Graham (2017) An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity1.00095100%
2Abowd, Kramarz, and Margolis (1999) High wage workers and high wage firms1.00085100%
3Bonhomme (2012) Functional differencing self1.00074100%
4Andrews, Gill, Schank, and Upward (2008) High wage workers and low wage firms: negative assortative matching or limited mobility bias?0.92843100%
5Dobronyi, Gu, and Kim (2021) Identification of dynamic panel logit models with fixed effects0.92843100%
6Lentz, Piyapromdee, and Robin (2022) The Anatomy of Sorting-Evidence from Danish Data0.87452100%
7Bonhomme, Lamadon, and Manresa (2019) A distributional framework for matched employer employee data0.81142100%
8Bonhomme, Holzheu, Lamadon, Manresa, Mogstad, and Setzler (2023) How much should we trust estimates of firm effects and worker sorting?0.73732100%
9Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val, Hahn, and Newey (2013) Average and quantile effects in nonseparable panel models0.73732100%
10Kline, Saggio, and Slvsten (2020) Leave-out estimation of variance components0.73732100%

Showing the top 10 of 51 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Debiased Machine Learning for Unobserved Heterogeneity: High-Dimensional Panels and Measurement Error Models0.51121
2Triadic Network Formation0.40511
3Tractable Identification of Strategic Network Formation Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity0.40511