EconBase
← All papers

Forward Orthogonal Deviations GMM and the Absence of Large Sample Bias

Robert F. Phillips

arXiv 28 Dec 2022 · Econometrics

arXiv:2212.14075 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

It is well known that generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators of dynamic panel data regressions can have significant bias when the number of time periods ($T$) is not small compared to the number of cross-sectional units ($n$). The bias is attributed to the use of many instrumental variables. This paper shows that if the maximum number of instrumental variables used in a period increases with $T$ at a rate slower than $T^{1/2}$, then GMM estimators that exploit the forward orthogonal deviations (FOD) transformation do not have asymptotic bias, regardless of how fast $T$ increases relative to $n$. This conclusion is specific to using the FOD transformation. A similar conclusion does not necessarily apply when other transformations are used to remove fixed effects. Monte Carlo evidence illustrating the analytical results is provided.

Citation extraction

22
references
86
in-text mentions
40
distinct cited
0
self-citations
9,048
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_titled_section at “Appendix: Proofs” · 69% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1(2017) Hsiao, C. & Zhou, Q. (2017)1.000113100%
2(2006) Bun, M. J. G., & Kiviet, J. F. (2006)1.00053100%
3(2003) Alvarez, J., & Arellano, M. (2003)0.874182100%
4(1999) Phillips, P. C. B. & Moon, H. R. (1999)0.81142100%
5(2000) Phillips, P. C. B. & Moon, H. R. (2000)0.73732100%
6(2015) Hsiao, C. & Zhang, J. (2015)0.64422100%
7(2008) Kapetanios, G. (2008)0.64422100%
8(1991) Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991)0.51121100%
9(2003) Arellano, M. (2003)0.51121100%
10(2009) Okui, R. (2009)0.51121100%

Showing the top 10 of 40 scored citations.