arXiv 27 Sep 2021 · Statistics — Methodology
arXiv:2109.13399 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
Sibling fixed effects (FE) models are useful for estimating causal treatment effects while offsetting unobserved sibling-invariant confounding. However, treatment estimates are biased if an individual's outcome affects their sibling's outcome. We propose a robustness test for assessing the presence of outcome-to-outcome interference in linear two-sibling FE models. We regress a gain-score--the difference between siblings' continuous outcomes--on both siblings' treatments and on a pre-treatment observed FE. Under certain restrictions, the observed FE's partial regression coefficient signals the presence of outcome-to-outcome interference. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the robustness test under several models. We found that an observed FE signaled outcome-to-outcome spillover if it was directly associated with an sibling-invariant confounder of treatments and outcomes, directly associated with a sibling's treatment, or directly and equally associated with both siblings' outcomes. However, the robustness test collapsed if the observed FE was directly but differentially associated with siblings' outcomes or if outcomes affected siblings' treatments.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 72% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sjölander A, Frisell T, Kuja-Halkola R, Öberg S, Zetterqvist J. Carr… (2016) ;27:852-858 | 1.000 | 7 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 | Mallinson DC, Elwert FE. Estimating sibling spillover effects with u… (2021) preprint: not peer reviewed | 0.950 | 7 | 4 | 86% |
| 3 | Kim Y, Steiner PM. Causal graphical views of fixed effects and rando… (2021) ;74:165-183 | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Frisell T, Öberg S, Kuja-Halkola R, Sjölander A. Sibling comparison… (2012) ;23:713-720 | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Sibling-comparison designs, are they worth the effort? Am J Epidemiol (2021) ;190:738-741 | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Axelsson PB, Clausen TD, Petersen AH, et al. Relation between infant… (2019) ;30:52-60 | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Syverson C, Seed K, Bruce FC, Callaghan WM. Rac… (2012) ;120:361-268 | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Elwert F, Winship C. Endogenous selection bias: the problem of condi… (2014) ;40:31-53 | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Hvolgaard Mikkelsen S, Olsen J, Bech BH, Obel C. Parental age and at… (2016) ;46:409-420 | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Lundholm C, Kearney PM, Gong T, Almqvist C. Mo… (2014) ;134:e806-813 | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 29 scored citations.