Andrés Ramírez-Hassan, Alejandro López-Vera
arXiv 16 Sep 2021 · Econometrics
arXiv:2109.07646 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
We provide a novel inferential framework to estimate the exact affine Stone index (EASI) model, and analyze welfare implications due to price changes caused by taxes. Our inferential framework is based on a non-parametric specification of the stochastic errors in the EASI incomplete demand system using Dirichlet processes. Our proposal enables to identify consumer clusters due to unobserved preference heterogeneity taking into account, censoring, simultaneous endogeneity and non-linearities. We perform an application based on a tax on electricity consumption in the Colombian economy. Our results suggest that there are four clusters due to unobserved preference heterogeneity; although 95% of our sample belongs to one cluster. This suggests that observable variables describe preferences in a good way under the EASI model in our application. We find that utilities seem to be inelastic normal goods with non-linear Engel curves. Joint predictive distributions indicate that electricity tax generates substitution effects between electricity and other non-utility goods. These distributions as well as Slutsky matrices suggest good model assessment. We find that there is a 95% probability that the equivalent variation as percentage of income of the representative household is between 0.60% to 1.49% given an approximately 1% electricity tariff increase. However, there are heterogeneous effects with higher socioeconomic strata facing more welfare losses on average. This highlights the potential remarkable welfare implications due taxation on inelastic services.
appendix boundary found by appendix_titled_section at “Appendix” · 78% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zhen, C., Finkelstein, E. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., Karns, S. A., and T… (2014) Predicting the effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on food and beverage demand in a large demand system | 1.000 | 8 | 3 | 100% |
| 2 | Tovar, M. and Wölfing, N (2018) Household energy prices and inequality: Evidence from German microdata based on the EASI demand system | 1.000 | 6 | 4 | 100% |
| 3 | Lewbel, A. and Pendakur, K (2009) Tricks with Hicks: The EASI Demand System | 0.961 | 9 | 6 | 89% |
| 4 | Conley, T., Hansen, C., McCulloch, R., and Rossi, P (2008) A semi-parametric bayesian approach to the instrumental variable problem | 0.950 | 7 | 3 | 86% |
| 5 | Banks, J., Blundell, R., and Lewbel, A (1997) Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand | 0.874 | 5 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Jensen, M. and Maheu, J (2014) Estimating a semiparametric asymmetric stochastic volatility model with a Dirichlet process mixture | 0.874 | 5 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J (1980) An almost ideal demand system | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Escobar, M. and West, M (1995) Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures | 0.737 | 4 | 2 | 75% |
| 9 | Schulte, I. and Heindl, P (2017) Price and income elasticities of residential energy demand in Germany | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Dickey, J. M (1971) The weighted likelihood ratio, linear hypotheses on normal location parameters | 0.644 | 4 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 56 scored citations.