EconBase
← All papers

Estimating Sibling Spillover Effects with Unobserved Confounding Using Gain-Scores

David C. Mallinson, Felix Elwert

arXiv 22 Feb 2021 · Statistics — Methodology

arXiv:2102.11150 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

A growing area of research in epidemiology is the identification of health-related sibling spillover effects, or the effect of one individual's exposure on their sibling's outcome. The health and health care of family members may be inextricably confounded by unobserved factors, rendering identification of spillover effects within families particularly challenging. We demonstrate a gain-score regression method for identifying exposure-to-outcome spillover effects within sibling pairs in a linear fixed effects framework. The method can identify the exposure-to-outcome spillover effect if only one sibling's exposure affects the other's outcome; and it identifies the difference between the spillover effects if both siblings' exposures affect the others' outcomes. The method fails in the presence of outcome-to-exposure spillover and outcome-to-outcome spillover. Analytic results and Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the method and its limitations. To exercise this method, we estimate the spillover effect of a child's preterm birth on an older sibling's literacy skills, measured by the Phonological Awarenesses Literacy Screening-Kindergarten test. We analyze 20,010 sibling pairs from a population-wide, Wisconsin-based (United States) birth cohort. Without covariate adjustment, we estimate that preterm birth modestly decreases an older sibling's test score (-2.11 points; 95% confidence interval: -3.82, -0.40 points). In conclusion, gain-scores are a promising strategy for identifying exposure-to-outcome spillovers in sibling pairs while controlling for sibling-invariant unobserved confounding in linear settings.

Citation extraction

45
references
89
in-text mentions
45
distinct cited
0
self-citations
7,458
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 59% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Gunasekara FI, Richardson K, Carter K, Blakely T. Fixed effects anal… (2014) ;43:264-2691.00053100%
2Imai K, Kim IS. When should we use unit fixed effects regression mod… (2019) ;63:467-4901.00053100%
3Sjölander A, Frisell T, Kuja-Halkola R, Öberg S, Zetterqvist J. Carr… (2016) ;27:852-8581.00053100%
4Kim Y, Steiner PM. Gain scores revisited: a graphical models perspec… (2019)0.92843100%
5Black SE, Breining S, Figlio DN, et al. Sibling spillovers. Econ J (2020) 1-280.84333100%
6StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station,… (2019)0.7373367%
7Mallinson DC, Grodsky E, Ehrenthal DB. Gestational age, kindergarten… (2019) ;33:467-4790.6443267%
8Hudgens MG, Halloran ME. Toward causal inference with interference.… (2008) ;103:832-8420.64422100%
9StataCorp. Stata 16 Base Reference Manual. College Station: Stata Pr… (2019) Available from: https://www.stata.com/manuals/r.pdf0.64422100%
10De Neve JW, Kawachi I. Spillovers between siblings and from offsprin… (2017) ;183:56-610.58531100%

Showing the top 10 of 45 scored citations.