EconBase
← All papers

Shoiuld Humans Lie to Machines: The Incentive Compatibility of Lasso and General Weighted Lasso

Mehmet Caner, Kfir Eliaz

arXiv 4 Jan 2021 · Econometrics

arXiv:2101.01144 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

We consider situations where a user feeds her attributes to a machine learning method that tries to predict her best option based on a random sample of other users. The predictor is incentive-compatible if the user has no incentive to misreport her covariates. Focusing on the popular Lasso estimation technique, we borrow tools from high-dimensional statistics to characterize sufficient conditions that ensure that Lasso is incentive compatible in large samples. We extend our results to the Conservative Lasso estimator and provide new moment bounds for this generalized weighted version of Lasso. Our results show that incentive compatibility is achieved if the tuning parameter is kept above some threshold. We present simulations that illustrate how this can be done in practice.

Citation extraction

27
references
67
in-text mentions
27
distinct cited
4
self-citations
11,603
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 59% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Caner, M. and A. B. Kock (2018) Asymptotically honest confidence regions for high dimensional parameters by the desparsified conservative lasso self0.85221662%
2Jankova, J. and S. van de Geer (2018) Semi-parametric efficiency bounds for high-dimensional models0.81413654%
3Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, and K. Kato (2017) Central limit theorems and bootstrap in high dimensions0.5113233%
4Buhlmann, P. and S. van de Geer (2011) Statitistics for High-Dimensional Data0.5112250%
5van de Geer, S (2016) Estimation and testing under sparsity0.5112250%
6Eliaz, K. and R. Spiegler (2019) The model selection curse self0.51121100%
7Eliaz, K. and R. Spiegler (2020) On incentive compatible estimators self0.51121100%
8van de Geer, S., P. Bühlmann, Y. Ritov, and R. Dezeure (2014) On asymptotically optimal confidence regions and tests for high-dimensional models0.51121100%
9Chiang, H (2020) Many average partial effects: with an application to text regression0.40511100%
10Cai, Y., C. Daskalakis, and C. Papadimitrou (2015) Optimum statistical estimation with strategic data sources0.40511100%

Showing the top 10 of 27 scored citations.