EconBase
← All papers

Doubly weighted M-estimation for nonrandom assignment and missing outcomes

Akanksha Negi

arXiv 23 Nov 2020 · Econometrics · publishedJournal of Causal Inference (2024) · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:2011.11485 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

This paper proposes a new class of M-estimators that double weight for the twin problems of nonrandom treatment assignment and missing outcomes, both of which are common issues in the treatment effects literature. The proposed class is characterized by a `robustness' property, which makes it resilient to parametric misspecification in either a conditional model of interest (for example, mean or quantile function) or the two weighting functions. As leading applications, the paper discusses estimation of two specific causal parameters; average and quantile treatment effects (ATE, QTEs), which can be expressed as functions of the doubly weighted estimator, under misspecification of the framework's parametric components. With respect to the ATE, this paper shows that the proposed estimator is doubly robust even in the presence of missing outcomes. Finally, to demonstrate the estimator's viability in empirical settings, it is applied to Calonico and Smith (2017)'s reconstructed sample from the National Supported Work training program.

Citation extraction

34
references
66
in-text mentions
34
distinct cited
1
self-citations
12,344
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 44% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Calónico, S. and J. Smith (2017) The women of the national supported work demonstration0.8746567%
2Angrist, J., V. Chernozhukov, and I. Fernández-Val (2006) Quantile Regression under Misspecification, with an Application to the U.S0.84333100%
3White, H (1982) Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models0.84333100%
4Wooldridge, J. M (2007) Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems0.84333100%
5LaLonde, R. J (1986) Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data0.7373367%
6Koenker, R. and G. Bassett (1978) Regression Quantiles0.73732100%
7Komunjer, I (2005) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for conditional quantiles0.73732100%
8Firpo, S (2007) Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects0.73732100%
9Soczyński, T. and J. M. Wooldridge (2018) A general double robustness result for estimating average treatment effects0.73732100%
10Hirano, K. and G. W. Imbens (2001) Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization0.64422100%

Showing the top 10 of 34 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
12012.007450.51121
2Generalized Kernel Ridge Regression for Causal Inference with Missing-at-Random Sample Selection0.40511
32406.138260.40511