EconBase
← All papers

A Novel Approach to Predictive Accuracy Testing in Nested Environments

Jean-Yves Pitarakis

arXiv 19 Aug 2020 · Econometrics · publishedEconometric Theory (2023) · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:2008.08387 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

We introduce a new approach for comparing the predictive accuracy of two nested models that bypasses the difficulties caused by the degeneracy of the asymptotic variance of forecast error loss differentials used in the construction of commonly used predictive comparison statistics. Our approach continues to rely on the out of sample MSE loss differentials between the two competing models, leads to nuisance parameter free Gaussian asymptotics and is shown to remain valid under flexible assumptions that can accommodate heteroskedasticity and the presence of mixed predictors (e.g. stationary and local to unit root). A local power analysis also establishes its ability to detect departures from the null in both stationary and persistent settings. Simulations calibrated to common economic and financial applications indicate that our methods have strong power with good size control across commonly encountered sample sizes.

Citation extraction

36
references
96
in-text mentions
69
distinct cited
0
self-citations
19,416
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_titled_section at “Online Supplementary Material” · 95% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Hansen, P.R. & A. Timmermann (2015) Equivalence between Out-of-Sample Forecast Comparisons and Wald Statistics1.00053100%
2Clark, T.E. & M. W. McCracken (2001) Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models0.84333100%
3Clark, T.E. & M. W. McCracken (2005) Evaluating Direct Multistep Forecasts0.84333100%
4Clark, T.E. & K. D. West (2007) Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested models0.81142100%
5Diebold, F.X. & R. Mariano (1995) Comparing Predictive Accuracy0.73732100%
6West, K (1996) Asymptotic Inference about Predictive Ability0.73732100%
7Engel, C. & S. Wu (2021) Forecasting the U.S0.64422100%
8McCracken, M (2007) Asymptotics for out of sample tests of Granger causality0.64422100%
9Fan, J., Liao, Y. & J. Yao (2015) Power Enhancement in High Dimensional Cross-Sectional Tests0.51121100%
10Granziera, E., Hubrich, K. & H. Moon (2014) Predictability Tests for a Small Number of Nested Models0.51121100%

Showing the top 10 of 69 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Robust Tests for Factor-Augmented Regressions with an Application to the Novel EA-MD-QD Dataset0.918227
2New Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy for Factor-Augmented Regressions with Weaker Loadings0.8433510
3Direct Multi-Step Forecast based Comparison of Nested Models via an Encompassing Test0.81142
4Estimation and Inference in Threshold Predictive Regression Models with Locally Explosive Processes0.40511
5High Dimensional Time Series Regression Models: Applications to Statistical Learning Methods0.40511