EconBase
← All papers

Dynamic shrinkage in time-varying parameter stochastic volatility in mean models

Florian Huber, Michael Pfarrhofer

arXiv 14 May 2020 · Econometrics · publishedJournal of Applied Econometrics (2020)

arXiv:2005.06851 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Successful forecasting models strike a balance between parsimony and flexibility. This is often achieved by employing suitable shrinkage priors that penalize model complexity but also reward model fit. In this note, we modify the stochastic volatility in mean (SVM) model proposed in Chan (2017) by introducing state-of-the-art shrinkage techniques that allow for time-variation in the degree of shrinkage. Using a real-time inflation forecast exercise, we show that employing more flexible prior distributions on several key parameters slightly improves forecast performance for the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK) and the Euro Area (EA). Comparing in-sample results reveals that our proposed model yields qualitatively similar insights to the original version of the model.

Citation extraction

14
references
31
in-text mentions
14
distinct cited
0
self-citations
3,550
main-text words

appendix boundary found by none_found · 100% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Chan JCC (2017) The stochastic volatility in mean model with time-varying parameters: An application to inflation modeling1.000135100%
2Kowal DR, Matteson DS, and Ruppert D (2019) Dynamic shrinkage processes0.81142100%
3Frühwirth-Schnatter S, and Wagner H (2010) Stochastic model specification search for Gaussian and partial non-Gaussian state space models0.64422100%
4Makalic E, and Schmidt DF (2015) A simple sampler for the horseshoe estimator0.51121100%
5Kastner G, and Frühwirth-Schnatter S (2014) Ancillarity-sufficiency interweaving strategy (ASIS) for boosting MCMC estimation of stochastic volatility models0.40511100%
6Carvalho CM, Polson NG, and Scott JG (2010) The horseshoe estimator for sparse signals0.40511100%
7Carter CK, and Kohn R (1994) On Gibbs sampling for state space models0.40511100%
8Frühwirth-Schnatter S (1994) Data augmentation and dynamic linear models0.40511100%
9Geweke J, and Amisano G (2010) Comparing and evaluating Bayesian predictive distributions of asset returns0.40511100%
10Hou C (2020) Time-Varying Relationship between Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty0.40511100%

Showing the top 10 of 14 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Bayesian Forecasting in Economics and Finance: A Modern Review0.40511
2The Dynamic Triple Gamma as a Shrinkage Process for Time-Varying Parameter Models0.40511