EconBase
← All papers

Does Subjective Well-being Contribute to Our Understanding of Mexican Well-being?

Jeremy Heald, Erick Treviño Aguilar

arXiv 23 Apr 2020 · Econometrics · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:2004.11420 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

The article reviews the history of well-being to gauge how subjective question surveys can improve our understanding of well-being in Mexico. The research uses data at the level of the 32 federal entities or States, taking advantage of the heterogeneity in development indicator readings between and within geographical areas, the product of socioeconomic inequality. The data come principally from two innovative subjective questionnaires, BIARE and ENVIPE, which intersect in their fully representative state-wide applications in 2014, but also from conventional objective indicator sources such as the HDI and conventional surveys. This study uses two approaches, a descriptive analysis of a state-by-state landscape of indicators, both subjective and objective, in an initial search for stand-out well-being patterns, and an econometric study of a large selection of mainly subjective indicators inspired by theory and the findings of previous Mexican research. Descriptive analysis confirms that subjective well-being correlates strongly with and complements objective data, providing interesting directions for analysis. The econometrics literature indicates that happiness increases with income and satisfying of material needs as theory suggests, but also that Mexicans are relatively happy considering their mediocre incomes and high levels of insecurity, the last of which, by categorizing according to satisfaction with life, can be shown to impact poorer people disproportionately. The article suggests that well-being is a complex, multidimensional construct which can be revealed by using exploratory multi-regression and partial correlations models which juxtapose subjective and objective indicators.

Citation extraction

68
references
126
in-text mentions
68
distinct cited
1
self-citations
10,082
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 97% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Fernandez, A. and Gomez, D (2019) A multidimensional approach to the well-being of the population of the states of Mexico0.87472100%
2Rojas, M (2018) Chapter 6, Happiness in Latin America has Social Foundations0.87462100%
3Maccagnan, A. and Wren‑Lewis, S. and Brown, H. and Taylor T (2017) Wellbeing and Society: Towards Quantification of the Co‑benefits of Wellbeing0.81142100%
4Rojas, M (2004) The Complexity of Well-being A Life Satisfaction Conception and a Domains-of-Life Approach0.81142100%
5Rojas, M (2011) El bienestar subjetivo: Su contribución a la Apreciación y la Consecución del Progreso y el Bienestar Humano, Realidad, Datos y…0.81142100%
6E. Angner (2011) The Evolution of Eupathics: The Historical Roots of Subjective Measures of Well-Being0.73732100%
7Cazzuffi, C. and Lopez, D (2018) Psychosocial wellbeing and place characteristics in Mexico0.73732100%
8Charles, H. and Aboites, G. and Llamas I (2018) Violence in the Household and Happiness in Mexico0.73732100%
9Clark, A. and Kamesaka, A. and Tamura, T (2015) Rising aspirations dampen satisfaction0.73732100%
10E. Diener, R. Inglehart, and L. Tay (2013) Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales, Social Indicators Research0.73732100%

Showing the top 10 of 68 scored citations.