EconBase
← All papers

Uniform inference for value functions

Sergio Firpo, Antonio F. Galvao, Thomas Parker

arXiv 22 Nov 2019 · Econometrics

arXiv:1911.10215 · PDF · Extracted main text

Abstract

We propose a method to conduct uniform inference for the (optimal) value function, that is, the function that results from optimizing an objective function marginally over one of its arguments. Marginal optimization is not Hadamard differentiable (that is, compactly differentiable) as a map between the spaces of objective and value functions, which is problematic because standard inference methods for nonlinear maps usually rely on Hadamard differentiability. However, we show that the map from objective function to an $L_p$ functional of a value function, for $1 \leq p \leq \infty$, are Hadamard directionally differentiable. As a result, we establish consistency and weak convergence of nonparametric plug-in estimates of Cram\'er-von Mises and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistics applied to value functions. For practical inference, we develop detailed resampling techniques that combine a bootstrap procedure with estimates of the directional derivatives. In addition, we establish local size control of tests which use the resampling procedure. Monte Carlo simulations assess the finite-sample properties of the proposed methods and show accurate empirical size and nontrivial power of the procedures. Finally, we apply our methods to the evaluation of a job training program using bounds for the distribution function of treatment effects.

Citation extraction

57
references
147
in-text mentions
58
distinct cited
1
self-citations
15,369
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 56% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Fan and Park (2010) Sharp Bounds on the Distribution of Treatment Effects and Their Statistical Inference1.00053100%
2van der Vaart and Wellner (1996) Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes0.89911573%
3Linton, Song, and Whang (2010) An Improved Bootstrap Test of Stochastic Dominance0.88810470%
CarcamoCuevasRodriguez19unmatched citation key CarcamoCuevasRodriguez190.81142100%
5Dehejia and Wahba (1999) Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs0.81142100%
6Williamson and Downs (1990) Probabilistic Arithmetic I. Numerical Methods for Calculating Convolutions and Dependency Bounds0.81142100%
7Shapiro (1990) On Concepts of Directional Differentiability0.7373367%
8Firpo and Ridder (2019) Partial Identification of the Treatment Effect Distribution and Its Functionals0.73732100%
9LaLonde (1986) Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data0.73732100%
10Fang and Santos (2019) Inference on Directionally Differentiable Functions0.70520435%

Showing the top 10 of 58 scored citations. 1 of these could not be matched to a bibliography entry, so only the citation key is shown.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Partial Identification and Inference for Conditional Distributions of Treatment Effects0.794208
2Partially Linear Models under Data Combination0.51152
3Loss aversion and the welfare ranking of policy interventions0.40511
4Ranking Policies Under Loss Aversion and Inequality Aversion0.40511
5Policy Learning with $$-Expected Welfare0.00011