EconBase
← All papers

Sustainable Investing and the Cross-Section of Returns and Maximum Drawdown

Lisa R. Goldberg, Saad Mouti

arXiv 13 May 2019 · Finance — Statistical Finance · publishedThe Journal of Finance and Data Science (2022) · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:1905.05237 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

We use supervised learning to identify factors that predict the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown for stocks in the US equity market. Our data run from January 1970 to December 2019 and our analysis includes ordinary least squares, penalized linear regressions, tree-based models, and neural networks. We find that the most important predictors tended to be consistent across models, and that non-linear models had better predictive power than linear models. Predictive power was higher in calm periods than in stressed periods. Environmental, social, and governance indicators marginally impacted the predictive power of non-linear models in our data, despite their negative correlation with maximum drawdown and positive correlation with returns. Upon exploring whether ESG variables are captured by some models, we find that ESG data contribute to the prediction nonetheless.

Citation extraction

56
references
63
in-text mentions
56
distinct cited
1
self-citations
14,284
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 96% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Gu, S., Kelly, B., and Xiu, D (2018) Empirical asset pricing via machine learning0.81142100%
2Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions0.73732100%
3Breiman, L (2001) Random forests0.51121100%
4Chen, T. and Guestrin, C (2016) XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system0.51121100%
5Altmann, A., Tolosi, L., Sander, O., and Lengauer, T (2010) Permutation importance: a corrected importance measure0.40511100%
6Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., and Hatfield, J. D (1985) An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability0.40511100%
7Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., and Trojanowski, G (2018) Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk0.40511100%
8Brammer, S., Brooks, C., and Pavelin, S (2006) Corporate social performance and stock returns: Uk evidence from disaggregated measures0.40511100%
9Carhart, M. M (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance0.40511100%
10Chekhlov, A., Uryasev, S., and Zabarankin, M (2004) Portfolio optimization with drawdown constraints0.40511100%

Showing the top 10 of 56 scored citations.