EconBase
← All papers

Optimizing the tie-breaker regression discontinuity design

Art B. Owen, Hal Varian

arXiv 22 Aug 2018 · Statistics — Methodology · publishedElectronic Journal of Statistics (2020) · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:1808.07563 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

Motivated by customer loyalty plans and scholarship programs, we study tie-breaker designs which are hybrids of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and regression discontinuity designs (RDDs). We quantify the statistical efficiency of a tie-breaker design in which a proportion $\Delta$ of observed subjects are in the RCT. In a two line regression, statistical efficiency increases monotonically with $\Delta$, so efficiency is maximized by an RCT. We point to additional advantages of tie-breakers versus RDD: for a nonparametric regression the boundary bias is much less severe and for quadratic regression, the variance is greatly reduced. For a two line model we can quantify the short term value of the treatment allocation and this comparison favors smaller $\Delta$ with the RDD being best. We solve for the optimal tradeoff between these exploration and exploitation goals. The usual tie-breaker design applies an RCT on the middle $\Delta$ subjects as ranked by the assignment variable. We quantify the efficiency of other designs such as experimenting only in the second decile from the top. We also show that in some general parametric models a Monte Carlo evaluation can be replaced by matrix algebra.

Citation extraction

27
references
35
in-text mentions
27
distinct cited
0
self-citations
9,203
main-text words

appendix boundary found by none_found · 100% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Robin Tepper Jacob, Pei Zhu, Marie-Andrée, Somers, and Howard Bloom (2012) A practical guide to regression discontinuity0.81142100%
2A. S. Goldberger (1972) Selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: Some formal illustrations0.73732100%
3Guido W Imbens and Donald B Rubin (2015) Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences0.73732100%
4Andrew Gelman and Guido Imbens (2017) Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs0.51121100%
5Joshua D. Angrist and Jorn-Steffen Pischke (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics0.40511100%
6Joshua D. Angrist and Jorn-Steffen Pischke (2014) Mastering Metrics0.40511100%
7Joshua Angrist, Sally Hudson, and Amanda Pallais (2014) Leveling up: Early results from a randomized evaluation of post-secondary aid0.40511100%
8Joseph C. Cappelleri and William M. K. Trochim (2003) Cutoff designs0.40511100%
9Guido Imbens and Thomas Lemieux (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice0.40511100%
10Wilbert Van Der Klaauw (2008) Regression–discontinuity analysis: A survey of recent developments in economics0.40511100%

Showing the top 10 of 27 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1A general characterization of optimal tie-breaker designs1.000145
2Multivariate Tie-breaker Designs1.00053
3On Statistical Discrimination as a Failure of Social Learning: A Multi-Armed Bandit Approach0.40511
4Regression Discontinuity Designs0.40511
5Double machine learning and design in batch adaptive experiments0.40511