Rina Friedberg, Julie Tibshirani, Susan Athey, Stefan Wager
arXiv 30 Jul 2018 · Statistics — Machine Learning · publishedJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics (2020) · 18 citations (OpenAlex)
arXiv:1807.11408 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
Random forests are a powerful method for non-parametric regression, but are limited in their ability to fit smooth signals, and can show poor predictive performance in the presence of strong, smooth effects. Taking the perspective of random forests as an adaptive kernel method, we pair the forest kernel with a local linear regression adjustment to better capture smoothness. The resulting procedure, local linear forests, enables us to improve on asymptotic rates of convergence for random forests with smooth signals, and provides substantial gains in accuracy on both real and simulated data. We prove a central limit theorem valid under regularity conditions on the forest and smoothness constraints, and propose a computationally efficient construction for confidence intervals. Moving to a causal inference application, we discuss the merits of local regression adjustments for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation, and give an example on a dataset exploring the effect word choice has on attitudes to the social safety net. Last, we include simulation results on real and generated data.
appendix boundary found by appendix_titled_section at “Appendix” · 83% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susan Athey, Julie Tibshirani, and Stefan Wager (2019) Generalized random forests self | 1.000 | 17 | 4 | 100% |
| 2 | Nicolai Meinshausen (2006) Quantile regression forests | 1.000 | 5 | 3 | 100% |
| 3 | Stefan Wager and Susan Athey (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests self | 0.903 | 19 | 6 | 74% |
| 4 | Joseph Sexton and Petter Laake (2009) Standard errors for bagged and random forest estimators | 0.811 | 4 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Torsten Hothorn, Berthold Lausen, Axel Benner, and Martin Radespiel-… (2004) Bagging survival trees | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Julie Tibshirani, Susan Athey, Rina Friedberg, Vitor Hadad, Luke Min… (2019) grf: Generalized Random Forests (Beta), 2019 self | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Adam Bloniarz, Ameet Talwalkar, Bin Yu, and Christopher Wu (2016) Supervised neighborhoods for distributed nonparametric regression | 0.644 | 4 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 | Gérard Biau (2012) Analysis of a random forests model | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Robert Tibshirani (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | Leo Breiman, Jerry Friedman, Charles J. Stone, and Richard A. Olshen (1984) Classification and Regression Trees | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 72 scored citations.
arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.