EconBase
← All papers

Inference on Local Average Treatment Effects for Misclassified Treatment

Takahide Yanagi

arXiv 10 Apr 2018 · Econometrics · publishedEconometric Reviews (2018) · 23 citations (OpenAlex)

arXiv:1804.03349 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

We develop point-identification for the local average treatment effect when the binary treatment contains a measurement error. The standard instrumental variable estimator is inconsistent for the parameter since the measurement error is non-classical by construction. We correct the problem by identifying the distribution of the measurement error based on the use of an exogenous variable that can even be a binary covariate. The moment conditions derived from the identification lead to generalized method of moments estimation with asymptotically valid inferences. Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical illustration demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed procedure.

Citation extraction

45
references
94
in-text mentions
45
distinct cited
0
self-citations
9,616
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 75% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1A. Mahajan (2006) Identification and estimation of regression models with misclassification1.000124100%
2A. Lewbel (2007) Estimation of average treatment effects with misclassification0.96911691%
3E. Battistin, M. De Nadai, and B. Sianesi (2014) Misreported schooling, multiple measures and returns to educational qualifications0.92843100%
4T. Ura (2018) Heterogeneous treatment effects with mismeasured endogenous treatment0.92843100%
5D. Card (1993) Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling0.87452100%
6F. DiTraglia and C. Garcia-Jimeno (2017) Mis-classified, binary, endogenous regressors: Identification and inference0.87452100%
7C. Caetano and J. C. Escanciano (2018) Identifying multiple marginal effects with a single instrument0.81142100%
8R. Calvi, A. Lewbel, and D. Tommasi (2017) Women's empowerment and family health: Estimating late with mismeasured treatment0.73732100%
9G. W. Imbens and J. D. Angrist (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects0.73732100%
10D. J. Aigner (1973) Regression with a binary independent variable subject to errors of observation0.64422100%

Showing the top 10 of 45 scored citations.

Cited by, within the corpus

arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.

Citing paperIntensityMentionsSections
1Local Average and Marginal Treatment Effects with a Misclassified Treatment0.64422
2Difference-in-Differences with a Misclassified Treatment0.64422
3Identification of Regression Models with a Misclassified and Endogenous Binary Regressor Hiroyuki Kasahara Vancouver School of Economics University of British Columbia [email removed] Katsumi Shimotsu Faculty of Economics University of Tokyo [email removed]0.51121
4Misclassification in Difference-in-Differences Models0.40511