arXiv 13 Mar 2018 · Econometrics · publishedEconometric Theory (2022) · 7 citations (OpenAlex)
arXiv:1803.04991 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text
We consider a situation where the distribution of a random variable is being estimated by the empirical distribution of noisy measurements of that variable. This is common practice in, for example, teacher value-added models and other fixed-effect models for panel data. We use an asymptotic embedding where the noise shrinks with the sample size to calculate the leading bias in the empirical distribution arising from the presence of noise. The leading bias in the empirical quantile function is equally obtained. These calculations are new in the literature, where only results on smooth functionals such as the mean and variance have been derived. We provide both analytical and jackknife corrections that recenter the limit distribution and yield confidence intervals with correct coverage in large samples. Our approach can be connected to corrections for selection bias and shrinkage estimation and is to be contrasted with deconvolution. Simulation results confirm the much-improved sampling behavior of the corrected estimators. An empirical illustration on heterogeneity in deviations from the law of one price is equally provided.
appendix boundary found by appendix_command · 45% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.
The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.
| Reference | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | Main text | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Okui, R. and T. Yanagi (2020) Kernel estimation for panel data with heterogenous dynamics | 0.874 | 5 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 | James, W. and C. Stein (1961) Estimation with quadratic loss | 0.843 | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 3 | Okui, R. and T. Yanagi (2019) Panel data analysis with heterogeneous dynamics | 0.843 | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 4 | Efron, B (2011) Tweedie's formula and selection bias | 0.737 | 3 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Chetty, R., J. N. Friedman, and J. E. Rockoff (2014) Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 | Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans (2015) Split-panel jackknife estimation of fixed-effect models | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 | Fernández-Val, I. and J. Lee (2013) Panel data models with nonadditive unobserved heterogeneity: Estimation and inference | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 8 | Hahn, J. and W. K. Newey (2004) Jackknife and analytical bias reduction for nonlinear panel models | 0.644 | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Chesher, A (1991) The effect of measurement error | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | Chesher, A (2017) Understanding the effect of measurement error on quantile regressions | 0.511 | 2 | 1 | 100% |
Showing the top 10 of 84 scored citations.
arXiv econ.EM papers that cite this one, ranked by how heavily they lean on it.
| Citing paper | Intensity | Mentions | Sections | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Factor-Augmented Panel Regressions and Variance-Weighted Treatment Effects | 0.405 | 1 | 1 |