EconBase
← All papers

Nonfractional Memory: Filtering, Antipersistence, and Forecasting

J. Eduardo Vera-Valdés

arXiv 20 Jan 2018 · Mathematics — Statistics Theory

arXiv:1801.06677 · PDF · DOI · OpenAlex · Extracted main text

Abstract

The fractional difference operator remains to be the most popular mechanism to generate long memory due to the existence of efficient algorithms for their simulation and forecasting. Nonetheless, there is no theoretical argument linking the fractional difference operator with the presence of long memory in real data. In this regard, one of the most predominant theoretical explanations for the presence of long memory is cross-sectional aggregation of persistent micro units. Yet, the type of processes obtained by cross-sectional aggregation differs from the one due to fractional differencing. Thus, this paper develops fast algorithms to generate and forecast long memory by cross-sectional aggregation. Moreover, it is shown that the antipersistent phenomenon that arises for negative degrees of memory in the fractional difference literature is not present for cross-sectionally aggregated processes. Pointedly, while the autocorrelations for the fractional difference operator are negative for negative degrees of memory by construction, this restriction does not apply to the cross-sectional aggregated scheme. We show that this has implications for long memory tests in the frequency domain, which will be misspecified for cross-sectionally aggregated processes with negative degrees of memory. Finally, we assess the forecast performance of high-order $AR$ and $ARFIMA$ models when the long memory series are generated by cross-sectional aggregation. Our results are of interest to practitioners developing forecasts of long memory variables like inflation, volatility, and climate data, where aggregation may be the source of long memory.

Citation extraction

24
references
65
in-text mentions
44
distinct cited
0
self-citations
6,619
main-text words

appendix boundary found by appendix_titled_section at “Appendix” · 85% of the source is main text. Read the extracted text to check this.

Most heavily cited references

The works this paper leans on most, across its whole bibliography — not restricted to papers in our corpus. Ranked by composite intensity, which combines how often a work is mentioned, how many sections mention it, and how much of that falls in the main text rather than the appendix.

ReferenceIntensityMentionsSectionsMain text
1Haldrup, N. and Vera Valdés, J. E (2017) Long memory, fractional integration, and cross-sectional aggregation0.8746367%
2Jensen, A. N. and Nielsen, M. (2014) A Fast Fractional Difference Algorithm0.7373367%
3Beran, J., Schtzner, M., and Ghosh, S (2010) From short to long memory: Aggregation and estimation0.73732100%
4Granger, C. W (1980) Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models0.73732100%
5Man, K. S (2003) Long memory time series and short term forecasts0.64441100%
6Beran, J., Feng, Y., Ghosh, S., and Kulik, R (2013) Long-Memory Processes: probabilistic theories and Statistical Methods0.64422100%
Beran et~al.unmatched citation key Beran et~al.0.51121100%
8Geweke, J. and Porter-Hudak, S (1983) The estimation and application of long memory time series models0.51121100%
Grangerunmatched citation key Granger0.51121100%
10Granger, C. W (1966) The Typical Spectral Shape of an Economic Variable0.51121100%

Showing the top 10 of 44 scored citations. 2 of these could not be matched to a bibliography entry, so only the citation key is shown.