Citation Analysis

Variance Estimation with Dependence and Heterogeneous Means
Luther Yap
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11497

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,545

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Xu, Ruonan and Yap, Luther (self)	2024	3	2	5.0	0.158	0.737	100%
2	Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido...	2020	2	2	3.0	0.105	0.644	100%
3	Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido...	2023	2	2	3.0	0.105	0.644	100%
4	Davezies, Laurent and D’haultfoe	2021	2	2	3.0	0.105	0.644	100%
5	Chan, Kin Wai	2022	2	1	2.0	0.105	0.511	100%
6	Casini, Alessandro	2023	2	1	2.0	0.105	0.511	100%
7	Cameron, A Colin and Gelbach, Jonah B and Miller, ...	2011	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
8	Chiang, Harold D and Hansen, Bruce E and Sasaki, Y...	2024	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
9	Newey, W and West, K	1987	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
10	Kojevnikov, Denis and Marmer, Vadim and Song, Kyun...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
11	Yap, Luther (self)	2025	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
12	Andrews, Donald WK	1991	1	1	2.0	0.053	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.