Citation Analysis

Bayesian Modular Inference for Copula Models with Potentially Misspecified Marginals
Lucas Kock, David T. Frazier, Michael Stanley Smith, David J. Nott
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11457
86
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
17
Sections
4,338
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Carmona, Christian and Nicholls, Geoff 2020 10 4 17.0 0.116 1.000 100%
2 Carmona, Chris U and Nicholls, Geoff K 2022 12 5 21.0 0.140 1.000 100%
3 Frazier, David T and Nott, David J (self) 2025 6 3 10.0 0.070 1.000 100%
4 Smith, Michael Stanley and Yu, Weichang and Nott, ... (self) 2025 8 5 14.0 0.093 1.000 100%
5 3 2 5.0 0.035 0.737 100%
6 Yu, Xuejun and Nott, David J and Smith, Michael St... (self) 2023 3 2 6.0 0.035 0.737 100%
7 Plummer, Martyn 2015 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
8 Garnett, Roman 2023 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 Loaiza-Maya, Rube 2019 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
10 Frazier, David T and Nott, David J (self) 2025 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
11 Jubinski, Daniel and Lipton, Amy F 2012 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
12 Jewson, Jack and Rossell, David 2022 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
13 Azzalini, A. and Valle, A. Dalla 1996 2 2 2.5 0.023 0.511 50%
14 Bissiri, Pier Giovanni and Holmes, Chris C and Wal... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Sklar, M 1959 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 Blei, David M and Kucukelbir, Alp and McAuliffe, J... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Ormerod, John T and Wand, Matt P 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling 2014 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Danilo Jimenez Rezende and Shakir Mohamed and Daan... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Kingma, Diederik P and Ba, Jimmy 2014 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Zeiler, Matthew D 2012 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Nguyen, Hien and Aus\'\i 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Chakraborty, Atlanta and Nott, David J and Drovand... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Tan, Linda SL and Nott, David J (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Mart\'i 2015 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Balandat, Maximilian and Karrer, Brian and Jiang, ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Syring, Nicholas and Martin, Ryan 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 McLatchie, Yann and Fong, Edwin and Frazier, David... (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Campbell, John Y. and Taksler, Glen B. 2003 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Emanuel Moench and Soroosh Soofi-Siavash 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Jones, M Chris and Pewsey, Arthur 2009 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Smith, Michael Stanley (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Smith, Michael Stanley and Maneesoonthorn, Worapre... (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Oh, Dong Hwan and Patton, Andrew J 2013 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Deng, Lin and Smith, Michael Stanley and Maneesoon... (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Michael Stanley Smith (self) 2015 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
40 Smith, Michael S and Vahey, Shaun P (self) 2016 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
41 Joe, Harry 2006 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
42 M.J. Daniels and M. Pourahmadi 2009 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
43 van der Vaart 1996 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.