Citation Analysis

\pkgForeComp
Minchul Shin, Nathan Schor
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07458
41
Citation mentions
13
Cited references
12
Sections
3,574
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lazarus, E., Lewis, D. J., Stock, J. H., and Watso... 2018 8 6 15.0 0.195 1.000 100%
2 Coroneo, L. and Iacone, F 2020 9 7 15.5 0.220 0.962 89%
3 Newey, W. K. and West, K. D 1994 4 4 7.0 0.098 0.928 100%
4 Stark, T 2010 5 2 9.0 0.122 0.874 100%
5 Kiefer, N. M. and Vogelsang, T. J 2005 3 2 5.0 0.073 0.737 100%
6 Diebold, F. X. and Mariano, R. S 1995 2 2 3.0 0.049 0.644 100%
7 Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., and Newbold, P 1997 2 2 3.0 0.049 0.644 100%
8 Sun, Y 2013 2 2 3.0 0.049 0.644 100%
9 McCracken, M. W 2019 2 2 3.0 0.049 0.644 100%
10 R Core Team 2024 1 1 1.0 0.024 0.406 100%
11 Canay, I. A., Romano, J. P., and Shaikh, A. M 2017 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
12 Muller, U. K 2004 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
13 Ibragimov, R. and Muller, U. K 2010 1 1 2.0 0.024 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.