Citation Analysis

Algorithmic Compliance and Regulatory Loss in Digital Assets
Khem Raj Bhatt, Krishna Sharma
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04328
65
Citation mentions
32
Cited references
11
Sections
4,067
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Elkan, Charles 2001 5 4 7.5 0.077 1.000 100%
2 Danielsson, Jon and James, Kevin R and Valenzuela,... 2016 4 4 5.5 0.062 0.928 100%
3 Oztas, Berkan and Cetinkaya, Deniz and Adedoyin, F... 2024 3 3 5.0 0.046 0.843 100%
4 Baek, Chung and Elbeck, Matt 2015 3 3 3.5 0.046 0.843 100%
5 Baur, Dirk G and Hong, KiHoon and Lee, Adrian D 2018 3 3 3.5 0.046 0.843 100%
6 Biais, Bruno and Bisiere, Christophe and Bouvard, ... 2023 3 3 3.5 0.046 0.843 100%
7 Widmer, Gerhard and Kubat, Miroslav 1996 3 3 3.5 0.046 0.843 100%
8 Gama, Jo\ a 2014 3 3 3.5 0.046 0.843 100%
9 Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis 2018 3 3 3.5 0.046 0.843 100%
10 Foley, Sean and Karlsen, Jonathan R and Putni\cn 2019 2 2 1.5 0.031 0.644 100%
11 Hardjono, Thomas and Lipton, Alexander and Pentlan... 2021 2 2 1.5 0.031 0.644 100%
12 Weber, Mark and Domeniconi, Giacomo and Chen, Jie ... 2019 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
13 Eom, Yunsung 2021 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
14 Bailey, David and Borwein, Jonathan and Lopez de P... 2017 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
15 De Prado, Marcos Lopez 2018 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
16 Fawcett, Tom 2006 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
17 Hand, David J 2009 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
18 Nami, Sanaz and Shajari, Mehdi 2018 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
19 Kleinberg, Jon and Mullainathan, Sendhil and Ragha... 2016 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
20 Corbett-Davies, Sam and Gaebler, Johann D and Nilf... 2023 2 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 100%
21 Davis, Jesse and Goadrich, Mark 2006 2 1 1.0 0.031 0.511 100%
22 Force, Financial Action Task 2021 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Meiklejohn, Sarah and Pomarole, Marjori and Jordan... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Schnoering, Hugo and Vazirgiannis, Michalis 2025 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Cong, Lin William and Li, Ye and Wang, Neng 2022 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Gandal, Neil and Hamrick, JT and Moore, Tyler and ... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Gu, Shihao and Kelly, Bryan and Xiu, Dacheng 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Kelly, Bryan T and Pruitt, Seth and Su, Yinan 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Sirignano, Justin and Cont, Rama 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Saito, Takaya and Rehmsmeier, Marc 2015 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
31 Moreno-Torres, Jose G and Raeder, Troy and Alaiz-R... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
32 Haider, MZ and Noreen, Tayyaba and Salman, M 2025 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.