← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Information Geometry of Bounded Rationality:\\ \Large Entropy--Regularised Choice with Hyperbolic and Elliptic Quantum Geometries
Anders Karlström, Christer Persson
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01785
64
Citation mentions
49
Cited references
6
Sections
8,775
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Russell, T 1991 5 3 9.0 0.078 1.000 100%
2 Khrennikov, A.\ 3 3 5.0 0.047 0.843 100%
3 Busemeyer, J. R., & Bruza, P. D 2012 2 2 3.0 0.031 0.644 100%
4 Sims, C. A 2003 2 2 2.0 0.031 0.644 100%
5 Luce, R. D 2003 2 2 2.0 0.031 0.644 100%
6 Aerts, D., Haven, E., & Sozzo, S 2018 2 2 3.0 0.031 0.644 100%
7 La Mura, P 2009 2 2 4.0 0.031 0.644 100%
8 Caticha, A 2021 2 2 4.0 0.031 0.644 100%
9 Bruza, P. D., Kitto, K., Nelson, D., & McEvoy, C 2009 2 1 2.0 0.031 0.511 100%
10 Shima, H 2007 2 1 4.0 0.031 0.511 100%
11 Etayo, F., Santamaria, R., and Trias, U. R 2006 2 1 4.0 0.031 0.511 100%
12 Luce, R. D 1959 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
13 von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O 1944 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 Aerts, D 1995 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Busemeyer, J. R., Wang, Z., & Townsend, J. T 2006 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Aerts, D 2009 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Yearsley, J. M., & Busemeyer, J. R 2016 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Yearsley, J. M 2017 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Khrennikov, A 2005 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Khrennikov, A. Y., & Haven, E 2009 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R 2013 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Haven, E., & Khrennikov, A 2016 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 de Barros, J. A., & Suppes, P 2009 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Mat\vejka, F., & McKay, A 2015 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 McFadden, D 1974 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Snickars, F., & Weibull, J. W 1977 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J 2017 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Machina, M. J 1982 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Betti, A. and Gori, M 2016 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Fox, S. and Kotelba, A 2018 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Busemeyer, J. R., Wang, Z., & Lambert-Mogiliansky,... 2009 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Busemeyer, J. R., Zhang, Q., Balakrishnan, S. N., ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
33 Stevens, S 1957 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
34 Sakitt, B 1973 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
35 Siomopoulos, V.\ 1975 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
36 Fishburn, P. C 1984 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
37 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
38 Dombrowski, P 1962 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
39 Molitor, M 2013 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
40 Reginatto, M 2013 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
41 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
42 Buckley, C. L., Kim, C. S., McGregor, S., & Seth, ... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
43 Amari, S.-I., & Nagaoka, H 2000 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
44 Harper, M 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
45 Sandholm, W. H 2010 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
46 Loomes, G., & Sugden, R 1982 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
47 Bell, D. E 1982 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
48 Levin M 2019 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
49 Asano, M., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., ... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.